Skip to main content

Low-to-Moderate Agreement Seen for Diagnosing Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema

Medically reviewed by Carmen Pope, BPharm. Last updated on April 24, 2025.

By Elana Gotkine HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, April 24, 2025 -- Different measurement tools and diagnostic criteria show low-to-moderate agreement for diagnosing breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), according to a study published in the April issue of Rehabilitation Oncology.

Cheryl L. Brunelle, P.T., from Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and colleagues examined diagnostic agreement among commonly utilized diagnostic thresholds for BCRL among 60 patients measured using four methods: tape measure (every 4 cm [Q4] and National Lymphedema Network [NLN] methods) converted to volume, optoelectronic limb volumetry, and bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS). Relative volume change (RVC) ≥10 percent, absolute volume difference ≥10 percent, and L-Dex scores >6.5 or >10 with and without preoperative baseline were compared as diagnostic thresholds.

Data were analyzed from 57 participants; 36.8 percent were diagnosed with BCRL (RVC ≥10 percent). The researchers found that when BCRL diagnosis included preoperative baseline, poor and insignificant diagnostic agreement was seen between RVC ≥10 percent and L-Dex increase ≥6.5 (Cohen's kappa, −0.083). Fair diagnostic agreement was seen between diagnosis made with versus without incorporation of preoperative baseline measurement (with preoperative baseline RVC and BIS: Cohen's kappa, 0.233; without preoperative baseline NLN, Q4, volumeter, or BIS without baseline: Cohen's kappa, 0.308); moderate agreement was seen for diagnosis via RVC versus volumeter (Cohen's kappa, 0.531). No diagnostic agreement was seen between L-Dex increase ≥6.5 from baseline and measures without preoperative baseline (NLN, Q4, and volumeter) for the 21 patients with BIS baseline.

"Our findings highlight the unacceptably low levels of agreement between different tests for recognizing this complication, and the urgent need to establish standardized diagnostic criteria," Brunelle said in a statement.

Abstract/Full Text

Disclaimer: Statistical data in medical articles provide general trends and do not pertain to individuals. Individual factors can vary greatly. Always seek personalized medical advice for individual healthcare decisions.

© 2025 HealthDay. All rights reserved.

Read this next

Patients Mainly Prefer AI as Second Reader for Screening Mammogram

WEDNESDAY, April 23, 2025 -- Use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a second reader in screening mammography is accepted by patients, according to a study published online April...

Breast Cancer Outcomes Improved With History of Screening Mammography

MONDAY, April 21, 2025 -- Prior screening mammography is associated with earlier stage at breast cancer diagnosis and lower breast cancer mortality, according to a study published...

Breast, Colorectal Cancer Screening Higher Than Lung Cancer Screening

TUESDAY, April 15, 2025 -- Among individuals eligible for lung cancer screening (LCS), use of breast cancer screening (BCS) and colorectal cancer screening (CCS) is much higher...

More news resources

Subscribe to our newsletter

Whatever your topic of interest, subscribe to our newsletters to get the best of Drugs.com in your inbox.