Skip to main content

Propofol (Monograph)

Brand name: Diprivan
Drug class: Non-barbiturates

Medically reviewed by Drugs.com on Jun 10, 2024. Written by ASHP.

Introduction

Sedative and hypnotic.1 2 215

Uses for Propofol

Induction and Maintenance of Anesthesia

IV induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.1 2 6 7 8 9 10 118 192 216 217 218 221

FDA-labeled for use as an IV induction agent for general anesthesia in adults and pediatric patients ≥3 years of age and for maintenance anesthesia in adults and pediatric patients ≥2 months of age.1 2

IV induction with propofol is rapid and results in dose-related hypnotic effects (progressing from light sleep to unconsciousness) and anterograde amnesia; however, analgesic properties not conclusively demonstrated.1 5 6 8 10 17 20 118 215 216 228 Generally produces loss of consciousness in <1 minute (time required for one arm-brain circulation).1 9 Following induction, anesthesia can be maintained by continuous IV infusion or intermittent IV injections.1 2 5 6 9 10 118 216 Recovery from propofol anesthesia is rapid because of fast redistribution and clearance of the drug.1 218

Usually associated with similar or faster time to recovery from anesthesia, more rapid recovery of psychomotor performance and time to discharge, and lower incidence of adverse effects (e.g., nausea, vomiting) compared with other IV anesthetic agents (e.g., etomidate, methohexital).6 7 9 10 118 215

Compared with inhalation anesthetics (e.g., sevoflurane, desflurane, isoflurane), propofol is associated with a consistent and clinically relevant lower incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.119 122 124 125 126 127 178 217 218 225

Procedural Sedation

Sedation in patients undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures across various clinical settings (e.g., emergency department, cardiac catheterization laboratories, radiology suites, endoscopy suites, dental offices).1 6 170 171 212 213 214 215 219 220 221 222 223 224 226 227 228 821 822 823 A preferred drug for this use because of rapid onset of effect, short duration, and rapid recovery.222 821 822 823

Generally used to provide moderate sedation (also referred to as conscious sedation) or deep sedation depending on the procedure, clinical setting, and patient requirements.212 213 214 219 822 823 Because propofol can produce rapid and profound changes in the depth of sedation and lacks a reversal agent, the American Society of Anesthesiologists states that even if moderate sedation is intended, patients should receive the same level of care required for deep sedation.757

May be used with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) or in conjunction with local or regional anesthesia.1 23 42 43 754 755

Although not FDA-labeled for use in children,1 propofol has been used widely for pediatric procedural sedation [off-label].99 214 221 222 223 226 821 822

Monitored Anesthesia Care

Initiation and maintenance of MAC sedation (alone or in combination with an opiate analgesic and/or a benzodiazepine) in adults undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic procedures.1 2 6 7 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 213

MAC is a specific anesthesia service performed by a qualified anesthesia provider and does not refer to a specific level of sedation.754 755 The MAC provider is focused exclusively on the patient's anesthetic needs and is prepared to manage any complications, including conversion to general anesthesia if necessary.754 755

Factors to consider when determining whether MAC sedation is indicated include the nature of the procedure, patient's clinical condition, risk factors, and/or need for deeper levels of analgesia and sedation than can be provided by moderate sedation (including need to convert to general or regional anesthesia).213 754 755

MAC sedation is distinguished from moderate sedation, which is a drug-induced depression of consciousness during which patients respond purposefully to verbal commands.754 755

Sedation in Critical Care Settings

Sedation in intubated and mechanically ventilated adults in a critical care setting (e.g., ICU);1 2 5 33 34 35 36 37 39 40 41 47 69 132 133 135 232 800 used alone or in combination with an opiate analgesic (e.g., morphine, fentanyl).1 2 5 8 33 35 36 38 39 41 69 132 133 135 136 159 160 162

Appears to be as effective as dexmedetomidine and benzodiazepines (e.g., midazolam, lorazepam) for ICU sedation; however, because of some modest clinical benefits (e.g., reduced duration of mechanical ventilation, shorter time to extubation, reduced risk of delirium), some experts state that nonbenzodiazepine sedatives (dexmedetomidine or propofol) may be preferred to benzodiazepines in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adults.800 801 817 818 819 820

When selecting an appropriate sedative agent, consider patient's individual sedation goals in addition to specific drug-related (e.g., pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, availability, cost) and patient-related (e.g., comorbid conditions such as anxiety, seizures, or alcohol or benzodiazepine withdrawal) factors.23 24 800 801

Because of its short duration of sedative effect, some experts state that propofol may be particularly useful in patients requiring frequent awakenings (e.g., for neurologic assessments) or undergoing daily sedation interruption protocols.801

Seizures

Has been used in patients with refractory status epilepticus [off-label].17 48 49 134 137 168 169 233 234

Nausea and Vomiting

Has been used for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting [off-label].17 50

Has been used in combination with conventional antiemetics for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with emetogenic cancer chemotherapy [off-label] .17 51 52

Pruritus

Has been used effectively for relief of pruritus [off-label] associated with use of spinal opiates or with cholestasis.17 53 54 55 56

Propofol Dosage and Administration

General

Patient Monitoring

Dispensing and Administration Precautions

Administration

IV Administration

Administer by IV infusion or IV injection.1 2 6 8 9 10 118

When administered by IV infusion, a controlled-infusion device (e.g., syringe or volumetric pump) is recommended.1 2 In patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), metered controlled devices may be used when mechanical pumps are not suitable.1 2

Propofol may be transferred to a syringe prior to administration.1 2 7 After cleaning the rubber stopper of the vial with 70% isopropyl alcohol, transfer contents into a sterile syringe immediately after vial is opened using a sterile vented spike.1 2 7 Label syringes with appropriate information, including date and time vial was opened.1 2

Shake well prior to administration.1 2 Do not use if there is evidence of excessive creaming or aggregation, if large droplets are visible, or if there are other forms of phase separation indicating that stability of the product has been compromised.1 2 Slight creaming, which may be visible upon prolonged standing, should disappear after shaking.1 2

Filters

Clinical experience with use of inline filters is limited.1 2 An inline membrane filter may be used; however, the mean pore diameter of the filter should be ≥5 µm unless it has been demonstrated that the filter does not restrict flow and/or cause breakdown of the emulsion.1 2 11 Use filters with caution and only when clinically appropriate.1 2 Monitor continuously for restricted flow and breakdown of the emulsion.1 2

Stability and Sterility Considerations

Manufacturers state that propofol should not be admixed with other drugs prior to administration.1 2 12 Do not administer through the same catheter as blood, serum, or plasma.1 2

Use strict aseptic technique during preparation and administration.1 2 231 Although commercially available preparations contain ingredients that retard growth of microorganisms (e.g., edetate disodium, sodium metabisulfite, sodium benzoate, benzyl alcohol), the emulsion may still support growth of microorganisms.1 2 231 Vials are intended for single-patient use and single access only.1 2 Discard unused drug within specified time limits.1 2 Failure to observe strict aseptic technique has resulted in microbial contamination and transmission of infections.1 2 Do not use if contamination is suspected.1 2

When used for general anesthesia or MAC sedation, start administration promptly and complete within 12 hours of opening vials.1 2 7 Prepare propofol for use immediately prior to initiation of each individual anesthetic/sedative procedure.1 2 Discard any unused portion, reservoirs, dedicated administration tubing, and/or solutions containing propofol at the end of the anesthetic procedure or after 12 hours (whichever occurs sooner).1 2 Flush the IV line every 12 hours (one manufacturer recommends flushing with 5% dextrose)192 and at the end of the procedure to remove residual propofol emulsion.1 2 181

When used for sedation in critical care settings, minimize manipulations of IV lines; start administration promptly and complete within 12 hours after inserting spike in vial.1 2 7 Use a sterile vent spike and sterile tubing.1 2 Discard any unused portion and the IV tubing at the end of the procedure or after 12 hours.1

Dilution

Commercially available 1% (10 mg/mL) injectable emulsion may be administered without dilution.1 2

If dilution is necessary, dilute with 5% dextrose injection only; do not dilute to a concentration less than 0.2% (2 mg/mL) in order to maintain the emulsion.1 2 Do not use if there is evidence of separation of the emulsion.1 2

Standardize 4 Safety

Standardized concentrations for propofol have been established through Standardize 4 Safety (S4S), a national patient safety initiative to reduce medication errors, especially during transitions of care.249 250 Multidisciplinary expert panels were convened to determine recommended standard concentrations.249 250 Because recommendations from the S4S panels may differ from the manufacturer’s prescribing information, caution is advised when using concentrations that differ from labeling, particularly when using rate information from the label.249 250 For additional information on S4S (including updates that may be available), see [Web].249 250

Dosing units differ from concentration units

Table 1: Standardize 4 Safety Continuous Infusion Standards for Propofol249250

Patient Population

Concentration standard

Dosing units

Adults

10 mg/mL

mcg/kg/min

Pediatric patients (<50 kg)

10 mg/mL

mcg/kg/min

Rate of Administration

Administer slowly to minimize adverse effects (e.g., hypotension, respiratory depression).1 2 Cardiorespiratory depression is more likely to occur at higher propofol concentrations resulting from rapid IV (“bolus”) injection or rapid increases in the rate of infusion.1 2

For IV injection, administer in incremental doses.1 2 6 8 9 10 118

When administered as an IV infusion, adjust rate of infusion according to individual requirements; allow sufficient time between rate adjustments to assess clinical effect.1 2 To avoid administering the drug at rates higher than clinically necessary, always titrate infusion rates downward in the absence of clinical signs of light anesthesia until a mild response to surgical stimulation is obtained.1 2

To optimize recovery times, manufacturers state that maintenance IV infusions usually should be administered at a rate of about 50–100 mcg/kg per minute in adults.1 2

Injection-site Pain

Pain on injection occurs frequently.1 221 229 230 Minimize pain by using larger veins of the forearm or antecubital fossa (rather than hand veins) and administering IV lidocaine (either as pretreatment or admixed with propofol).1 2 144 221 230 Because lidocaine may cause instability of the propofol emulsion, manufacturers recommend administering 1 mL of 1% lidocaine hydrochloride solution 30–120 seconds prior to propofol administration or adding lidocaine to propofol immediately prior to administration in quantities not exceeding 20 mg of lidocaine per 200 mg of propofol.1 2 6 8 9 144

Administration Precautions

Due to potential for rapid and profound changes in the depth of anesthesia and sedation, special precautions are required when administering propofol.757 The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) states that even if moderate sedation is intended, patients receiving propofol should receive care consistent with that required for deep sedation.757

During administration, monitor patients continuously to assess level of consciousness and identify early signs of hypotension, bradycardia, apnea, airway obstruction, and/or oxygen desaturation.220 757 There are different considerations when propofol is used for ICU sedation.757 Administration of propofol is regulated at the state, regional, and local levels; such guidance should be consulted.213 757

Dosage

Individual response to propofol is variable; therefore, adjust dosage (including infusion rate or amount and frequency of incremental doses) according to individual requirements and response, age, weight, clinical status (e.g., ASA physical status, degree of debilitation), blood lipid profile, underlying pathologic conditions (e.g., shock, intestinal obstruction, malnutrition, anemia, burns, advanced malignancy, ulcerative colitis, uremia, alcoholism), and type and amount of premedication or concomitant medication(s) used.1 2 118 Use the smallest effective dosage.1 2

Pediatric Patients

Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia
IV

Induction of anesthesia in children 3–16 years of age: 2.5–3.5 mg/kg until induction onset, as determined by clinical response, in those with ASA physical status of I or II.1 2 Within this dosage range, younger patients may require higher induction dosages than older patients.1 2 A lower dosage is recommended for induction of anesthesia in patients with ASA physical status of III or IV.1 2

Maintenance of anesthesia in children 2 months to 16 years of age: May be given by IV infusion or intermittent bolus injection. IV infusion: 125–300 mcg/kg per minute (7.5–18 mg/kg per hour) administered concomitantly with inhaled 60–70% nitrous oxide and oxygen in those with ASA physical status of I or II.1 2 Dosage of 200–300 mcg/kg per minute may be required for the first 30 minutes after induction, then decrease dosage to 125–150 mcg/kg per minute (unless clinical signs of light anesthesia develop) by titration, according to the patient’s response.1 2 Within this dosage range, younger patients may require higher infusion rates than older patients.1 2

Intermittent IV bolus: 1–4 mg/kg initially, followed by administration of 0.5–2 mg/kg injections based on patient response.1 2

Procedural Sedation†
IV

Various dosage regimens have been used.99 212 222 226 Individualize appropriate dose and depth of sedation based on the procedure and needs of the patient.213

Has been given as an initial IV bolus injection followed by intermittent injections or by continuous IV infusion to maintain desired level of sedation.99 212 222

In pediatric patients undergoing procedural sedation, an initial IV propofol dose of 1 mg/kg has been used.99 222 226 In one study, children 3–18 years of age undergoing an emergency orthopedic procedure received an initial IV propofol dose of 1 mg/kg, followed by smaller intermittent doses based on patient response.222 226 In another study in children ≥2 years of age who received propofol sedation for closed orthopedic reductions, the drug was given as an initial 1-mg/kg IV bolus dose over 2 minutes, followed by an IV infusion of 67–100 mcg/kg per minute until cast completion.99 To maintain the desired level of sedation, additional IV bolus doses of 1 mg/kg were administered and/or the infusion rate was adjusted.99

Adults

Induction and Maintenance of General Anesthesia
General Surgery
IV

Induction of anesthesia in adults <65 years of age with ASA physical status of I or II: 2–2.5 mg/kg according to the patient’s response until the onset of induction.1 2

Maintenance of anesthesia in adults <65 years of age: Initially, 100–200 mcg/kg per minute (6–12 mg/kg per hour) administered concomitantly with inhaled 60–70% nitrous oxide and oxygen.1 2 Higher IV infusion rates of 150–200 mcg/kg per minute may be required for the first 10–15 minutes after induction, then decrease the infusion rate by 30–50% during the first 30 minutes of maintenance anesthesia.1 2 IV infusion rates of 50–100 mcg/kg per minute usually are used to optimize recovery times.1

Alternatively, for maintenance of anesthesia in adults <65 years of age: 25–50 mg by intermittent IV injection in combination with inhaled nitrous oxide.1 2 192 These incremental boluses may be given, if necessary, as determined by clinical signs (increases in pulse rate, BP, sweating, and/or lacrimation) indicating a stress response to surgical stimulation or emergence from anesthesia.1 2

In geriatric (65 years of age and older), debilitated, or ASA III or IV physical status patients, lower induction doses of 1–1.5 mg/kg are usually required with a usual maintenance IV infusion rate of 50–100 mcg/kg per minute (3–6 mg/kg per hour).

Cardiac Anesthesia
IV

Induction of anesthesia: 0.5–1.5 mg/kg until the onset of induction, as determined by the clinical response of the patient.1 2 192 Maintenance dose of propofol in adult cardiac patients: 25-100 mcg/kg/min, adjusted according to the patient’s sedation level and clinical response.1 2

Neurosurgery
IV

Induction of anesthesia: 1–2 mg/kg until the onset of induction, as determined by the clinical response of the patient.1 2

Maintenance of anesthesia: 100–200 mcg/kg per minute (6–12 mg/kg per hour).1 2

Procedural Sedation
IV

Various dosage regimens have been used.212 213 222 224 227 228 Individualize appropriate dose and depth of sedation based on the procedure and needs of the patient.213 Usually given as an initial IV bolus injection followed by intermittent injections or continuous IV infusion to maintain desired level of sedation; also has been given by IV infusion throughout the procedure.212 213 222 224 227 228 Administration by IV infusion may allow for more precise control of the level of sedation compared with a repeated bolus technique.228

In clinical studies, an IV propofol dose of 1 mg/kg was commonly used to achieve initial sedation in adults undergoing a diagnostic or therapeutic procedure; however, lower (e.g., 0.5 mg/kg) or higher (e.g., 1.5 mg/kg) initial doses also have been used.222 224 227 822 To maintain the desired level of sedation, additional doses (e.g., 0.25-0.5 mg/kg by intermittent IV injection) usually are administered as needed.222 224 227

Monitored Anesthesia Care
IV

Initiation of MAC sedation in healthy adults <65 years of age: Infusion of 100–150 mcg/kg per minute (6–9 mg/kg per hour) for 3–5 minutes; alternatively, injection of 0.5 mg/kg over 3–5 minutes.1 2 Slow rate of infusion or injection recommended to reduce the risk of apnea and hypotension.1 2

Maintenance dosage in healthy adults <65 years of age: Infusion of 25–75 mcg/kg per minute (1.5–4.5 mg/kg per hour) for the first 10–15 minutes, then decrease the infusion rate to 25–50 mcg/kg per minute.1 2 Adjust dosage according to clinical effect, allowing approximately 2 minutes for onset of peak drug response.1 2

Alternatively, for maintenance therapy, administer intermittent IV injections of 10 or 20 mg; however, a variable-rate IV infusion is preferred.1 2

In geriatric, debilitated, ASA III or IV physical status, or neurosurgical patients, reduce maintenance dosage by 20%.1 2 Rapid IV injection is not recommended in these patients because of an increased risk of adverse cardiorespiratory effects.1 2

Sedation in Critical Care Settings
IV

Individualize dosage and titrate to the desired level of sedation; in most cases, a light rather than deep level of sedation is recommended in critically ill, mechanically ventilated adults because of improved clinical outcomes (e.g., shortened duration of mechanical ventilation, reduced ICU length of stay).800 801 Assess depth and quality of sedation frequently using a validated and reliable assessment tool (e.g., Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [RASS], Sedation-Agitation Scale [SAS]).801

Initiate slowly with a continuous IV infusion to minimize risk of hypotension.1 2 5 7 10 33 36 38 41 47 133 134 136 Because most patients will have residual effects from previous anesthetic or sedative agents, manufacturers recommend an initial infusion rate of 5 mcg/kg per minute (0.3 mg/kg per hour) for at least 5 minutes.1 2 5 Increase infusion rate slowly in increments of 5–10 mcg/kg per minute (0.3–0.6 mg/kg per hour) until desired level of sedation is achieved; allow a minimum period of 5 minutes between dosage adjustments to assess clinical effects.1 2 5

For maintenance of sedation, most adults require 5–50 mcg/kg per minute (0.3–3 mg/kg per hour); higher maintenance infusion rates occasionally required (e.g., patients who have recovered from general anesthesia or deep sedation).1 2 5 However, manufacturers state that infusion rate should not exceed 4 mg/kg per hour unless benefits outweigh risks.1 2 Infusion rates >4 mg/kg per hour associated with propofol infusion syndrome.759

Rapid IV (“bolus”) administration of 10- or 20-mg doses may be used to rapidly increase depth of sedation in patients in whom development of hypotension is unlikely.1 2

Assess level of sedation and CNS function at regular intervals (at least daily during maintenance sedation); adjust infusion rate accordingly to ensure adequate titration of the sedation level.1 2 136 181 192

Do not abruptly discontinue propofol prior to weaning or for daily evaluation of sedation levels.1 2

Do not administer Diprivan injectable emulsion as a continuous IV infusion for >5 days without a drug-free interval to allow replacement of estimated or measured urinary zinc losses.1 2 136

Some tolerance to the drug’s sedative effects may occur during long-term (>7 days) therapy; increasing the infusion rate may be necessary.5 64 However, such effects also may be associated with changes in drug elimination or an improved health status of the patient.64

Seizures†
Refractory Status Epilepticus†
IV

Initially, 1- to 2-mg/kg doses by IV injection over 5 minutes; repeat when seizure activity no longer is adequately controlled.137 Maintenance infusion of 2–10 mg/kg per hour; adjust the infusion rate until the lowest rate of infusion needed to suppress epileptiform activity is achieved.137 Gradually decrease the dosage to prevent withdrawal seizures.137

Nausea and Vomiting†
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting†
IV

Doses of 10–15 mg have been used.17 50

Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Emetogenic Cancer Chemotherapy†
IV

Dosage of 1 mg/kg per hour as a continuous IV infusion has been used.17 51 52

Pruritus†
Pruritus Associated with Use of Spinal Opiates†
IV

Doses of 10 mg administered by direct IV injection have been used; alternatively, IV infusions of 0.5–1 mg/kg per hour have been used.17 53 54

Pruritus Associated With Cholestasis†
IV

Doses of 15 mg administered by direct IV injection have been used; alternatively, IV infusions of 1–1.5 mg/kg per hour have been used.17 53 54

Special Populations

Hepatic Impairment

The manufacturer makes no specific dosage recommendations for patients with hepatic impairment.1

Renal Impairment

The manufacturer makes no specific dosage recommendations for patients with renal impairment.1

Geriatric Patients

Lower doses are recommended for initiation and maintenance of sedation and anesthesia in geriatric patients.1 2

Cautions for Propofol

Contraindications

Warnings/Precautions

Warnings

Anaphylactic and Anaphylactoid Reactions

Anaphylactoid and/or anaphylactic reactions (e.g., angioedema, bronchospasm, erythema, hypotension) reported rarely following propofol administration; may be fatal or life-threatening.1 2 6

Sulfite Sensitivity

Some formulations contain sulfites that may cause allergic-type reactions (including anaphylaxis and life-threatening or less severe asthmatic episodes) in certain susceptible individuals.3 163

Potential for Microbial Contamination

Potential for microbial contamination of the injection and consequent development of fever, infection, sepsis, other life-threatening illness, or death with improper aseptic technique when handling propofol.1 2 103 195 231 In addition, transmission of bloodborne pathogens (e.g., hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV) reported from unsafe injection practices and use of propofol vials intended for single use on multiple patients.1 2

Although commercially available preparations contain ingredients that retard growth of microorganisms, they are not considered antimicrobially preserved products by USP standards.1 2 103 Contamination of propofol with even very small numbers of microorganisms may result in clinical disease;197 strict aseptic technique and strict adherence to the manufacturer’s preparation and handling instructions are required.1 2 103 113 195 197 198 199

Do not use if contamination is suspected; discard unused portions of the drug as recommended by the manufacturers.1 2

Respiratory and Cardiovascular Effects

Risk of respiratory depression;1 2 5 6 8 9 apnea and airway obstruction can occur, especially following rapid bolus injection and/or administration of larger doses such as those used for induction of anesthesia.1 2 6 8 9 10 118 228

Cardiovascular depressant1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 118 with effects greater than or equal to those associated with other IV induction agents.6 8 9 10 118 The main adverse cardiovascular effect during induction of anesthesia is hypotension, with ≥30% decreases in systolic and diastolic BP.1 2 6 7 118

Patients with impaired myocardial function, intravascular volume depletion, or abnormally low vascular tone (sepsis) may be more susceptible to hypotension.1 2

Management of hypotension may include discontinuance of propofol, increasing the rate of IV fluid administration (except when additional fluid therapy is contraindicated), elevation of the lower extremities, and/or use of vasopressors.1 2

Possible bradycardia, asystole, and rarely, cardiac arrest, especially in pediatric patients receiving fentanyl concomitantly.1 2 Consider intervention with anticholinergic agents (e.g., atropine, glycopyrrolate) to modify potential increases in vagal tone associated with surgical stimuli or concomitant use of certain drugs (e.g., succinylcholine).1 2

Pulmonary edema reported rarely; causal relationship not established.1 2

Monitor sedated patients continuously for early signs of hypotension and bradycardia;1 2 also monitor for adverse respiratory effects (e.g., apnea, airway obstruction, oxyhemoglobin desaturation), especially in those undergoing MAC sedation.1 2

Cardiorespiratory effects are more likely to occur following administration of rapid IV (“bolus”) injections, especially in patients with ASA physical status of III or IV and in geriatric or debilitated patients.1 2

Facilities necessary for intubation, assisted respiration, administration of oxygen, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be readily available.1 2 6 7 131 192

Seizures

Propofol appears to be associated with both anticonvulsant activity and excitatory effects (e.g., seizures, myoclonus, opisthotonos) on the nervous system.5 6 17 117 118

Patients with a history of seizure disorders who are receiving propofol are at increased risk of developing seizures during the recovery phase of anesthesia.1 2

Neurosurgical Anesthesia

Avoid substantial decreases in mean arterial pressure (because of the resultant decreases in cerebral perfusion pressure) in patients with increased intracranial pressure or impaired cerebral circulation who are undergoing neurosurgery.1 2 To avoid substantial hypotension and decreases in cerebral perfusion pressure, administer by IV infusion or slow IV injection.1 2

If increased intracranial pressure is suspected, administer in combination with hyperventilation and hypocarbia.1

Cardiac Anesthesia

Use slower rates of IV administration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery who received premedication and in those with recent fluid imbalance or those who are hemodynamically unstable.1 2 181 192 Correct fluid depletion prior to administration of propofol.1 2

If additional fluid therapy is contraindicated, management of hypotension may include discontinuance of propofol, elevation of the lower extremities, and/or use of vasopressors.1 2

Studied extensively in patients with CAD and in those with valvular or congenital heart disease.1 2

Critical Care Sedation

Failure to reduce the infusion rate during prolonged therapy may result in excessively high blood concentrations of propofol; titrate according to individual clinical response.1 2 136 181 Evaluate sedation levels at least daily.1 2 136 181

Prior to weaning patients from mechanical ventilator assistance, discontinue neuromuscular blocking agents1 2 or reverse neuromuscular blockade181 and discontinue opiate therapy1 2 or adjust the dosage181 to optimize respiratory function and/or to maintain a light level of sedation.1 2 If respiratory depression does not develop, maintain this level of sedation during the weaning process since abrupt withdrawal has been associated with rapid awakening accompanied by anxiety, agitation, and resistance to mechanical ventilation, thus making the weaning process difficult.1 2 Therefore, the manufacturers recommend that administration of propofol be continued to produce a light level of sedation until about 10–15 minutes prior to extubation.1 2

Propofol Infusion Syndrome

Propofol infusion syndrome reported in patients receiving propofol for sedation in a critical care setting.1 2 211 Characterized by severe metabolic acidosis, hyperkalemia, lipidemia, rhabdomyolysis, hepatomegaly, and cardiac, renal, or circulatory failure.1 2 211 Occurs most frequently in patients receiving prolonged, high-dose infusions (>5 mg/kg per hour for >48 hours) but has occurred following short-term, high-dose infusions during surgical anesthesia.1 2 211

Closely monitor patients for development of unexplained acidosis, rhabdomyolysis, and cardiac or renal failure.211 Consider alternate means of sedation in the setting of prolonged need for sedation, increasing propofol dosage requirements to maintain a constant level of sedation, or onset of metabolic acidosis during propofol infusion.1 2

Effects on Lipids

Commercial propofol preparations are oil-in-water emulsions; use with caution in patients with disorders of lipid metabolism (e.g., primary hyperlipoproteinemia, diabetic hyperlipemia, pancreatitis).1 2

Prolonged administration may result in increased serum lipid concentrations (e.g., hypertriglyceridemia); monitor patients undergoing sedation in a critical care setting who are at risk of developing hyperlipidemia for increases in serum triglyceride concentrations or serum turbidity.1 2

Reduce the quantity of concurrently administered lipids (e.g., fat emulsions for parenteral nutrition) in these patients in order to compensate for the amount of lipids contained in the propofol formulation (1 mL of propofol injectable emulsion contains 0.1 g of fat [1.1 kcal]).1 2

Zinc Loss

Certain formulations (e.g., Diprivan) contain edetate disodium, a strong chelator of trace metal, including zinc.1 136

Do not administer IV infusions of propofol for longer than 5 days without a drug-free interval to replace urine zinc losses.1

In patients who are predisposed to zinc deficiency (e.g., those with burns, diarrhea, major sepsis), consider the need for supplemental zinc during prolonged therapy with edetate disodium-containing formulations.1

Renal toxicity reported rarely in patients receiving high dosages (2–3 g daily) of edetate disodium; however, decreased renal function has not been observed in clinical studies to date in patients with normal or impaired renal function receiving propofol (Diprivan).1 Manufacturer of Diprivan recommends that laboratory analysis of urine (including urine sediment) be performed prior to sedation and every other day during therapy in patients at risk for developing renal impairment.1

Use in Debilitated, Elderly, or ASA-PS III or IV Patients

Use a lower induction dose and slower maintenance rate of administration in elderly, debilitated, or ASA-PS III or IV patients.1 Continuously monitor patients for early signs of hypotension and/or bradycardia.1 Apnea requiring ventilatory support often occurs during induction and may persist for more than 60 seconds.1

Local Effects

Pain at the injection site occurs in up to 70% of patients144 following peripheral IV administration.1 5 6 7 8 9 89 118 144 Thrombosis or phlebitis reported rarely.1 2

Pain, but no evidence of major sequelae, reported following inadvertent intra-arterial injection.1 2 8 118 Local pain, swelling, blisters, and/or tissue necrosis reported rarely following inadvertent extravasation.1 2

To minimize pain at injection site, use larger veins of the forearm or antecubital fossa rather than hand veins; may also administer lidocaine prior to propofol administration or add lidocaine to propofol immediately before administration in a quantity not exceeding 20 mg of lidocaine per 200 mg of propofol.1 2 6 8 9 144 Other methods that may be beneficial include prior administration of low-dose opiates or other analgesic agents and venous occlusion with a tourniquet.221 230

Risk of Aggregation if Administered through the Same Intravenous Catheter with Blood or Plasma

Propofol should not be administered through the same catheter as blood or plasma because compatibility not established.1 2 Aggregates of the globular component of the vehicle containing propofol may form when the drug is in contact with blood, serum, or plasma.1 2 Clinical importance of these effects not known.1 2

Postoperative Effects

Associated rarely with a period of postoperative unconsciousness (sometimes preceded by a brief period of wakefulness), which may be accompanied by increased muscle tone; recovery has been spontaneous.1 2

Perioperative Myoclonia

Perioperative myoclonia, rarely including convulsions and opisthotonos, reported.1

Pulmonary Edema

Pulmonary edema reported rarely in temporal relationship to administration of propofol, although causal relationship not established.1

Pancreatitis

Pancreatitis (sometimes requiring hospitalization) reported in adults undergoing induction of anesthesia1 2 85 86 87 88 167 or prolonged sedation with propofol in a critical care setting.84 87 167 Causal relationship with propofol not established; consider the possibility of pancreatitis in patients receiving propofol.85 86 181 192

Dependence, Tolerance, and Abuse

Dependence and abuse, sometimes resulting in death, have been reported.57 83 109 200 201 202 203 204 206 207 208 209 Most reported cases have involved healthcare professionals (principally anesthesiology personnel),57 65 66 109 201 202 203 204 209 but abuse by lay persons also reported.200 206 208 209

Currently not subject to control under the Federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970; however, some clinicians have suggested such control or some other means of ensuring greater accountability (e.g., restriction of access, drug accounting procedures, routine testing for propofol in drug screenings of at-risk individuals).1 2 65 67 83 204 205 Prevalence of abuse and related deaths appears to be greater at institutions with no established system to control or monitor propofol use.204 205

Psychological dependence (e.g., intense craving for the drug, loss of control over amount and frequency of use) reported in cases of propofol abuse.57 200 202 206 207 Withdrawal symptoms (e.g., insomnia, anxiety, difficulty concentrating), suggesting physical dependence, observed rarely.202 Signs of tolerance also observed.109 200 206

General Precautions

CNS Effects

Performance of activities requiring mental alertness (e.g., driving, operating machinery, signing legal documents) may be impaired for some time after general anesthesia or sedation with propofol.1 2 Concomitant use of opiate analgesics and benzodiazepines can increase the risk of CNS effects.1 2

Monitored Anesthesia Care

A variable infusion rate is preferred to intermittent bolus administration for maintenance of MAC sedation in healthy adults because the risk of hypotension may be lower.1 2 192 If intermittent IV injections are given, consider the possibility of respiratory depression, transient increases in sedation depth, and/or prolongation of recovery.1 2

Specific Populations

Pregnancy

No adequate and controlled studies in pregnant women.1 2 Not recommended for obstetric surgery (e.g., cesarean section).1 2

In animal reproduction studies, decreased pup survival and increased postimplantation loss observed.1

Based on animal data, repeated or prolonged use of general anesthetics and sedation drugs, including propofol, during the third trimester of pregnancy may result in adverse neurodevelopmental effects in the fetus.750 753

Lactation

Distributed into milk;1 2 6 19 use not recommended by manufacturers.1 2

Some clinicians state that nursing women undergoing surgery may receive usual anesthetic induction doses of propofol;118 however, since trace amounts of the drug may be present in milk, drowsiness of nursing infants may occur on the day of the procedure.118

Pediatric Use

Manufacturer states safety and efficacy for induction of general anesthesia not established in children <3 years of age; safety and efficacy for maintenance of general anesthesia not established in children <2 months of age.1

The manufacturers state that propofol is not recommended for sedation in critical care settings or for use in combination with regional anesthesia in children <16 years of age1 2 192 because safety for these uses in this patient population has not been established.1 2 90 146 192 Severe, progressive metabolic (e.g., lactic) acidosis syndrome (that may progress to death) has been reported in several ventilated children (mainly with respiratory infections) receiving propofol for sedation in critical care settings.1 2 5 90 91 140 142 143 146 147

Has been used in children undergoing MAC sedation for surgical, diagnostic, and other procedures (e.g., lumbar puncture with intrathecal chemotherapy, bone marrow aspiration and biopsy, central venous catheter placement, transesophageal echocardiogram, cardiac catheterization, radiologic examinations, orthopedic manipulations);94 95 however, the manufacturers state that propofol should not be used for MAC sedation in children because safety and efficacy have not been established.1 2

Abrupt discontinuance following prolonged IV infusion in children may result in flushing of the hands and feet, agitation, tremulousness, hyperirritability, increased incidence of bradycardia, agitation, or jitteriness.1

Repeated or prolonged use of general anesthetics and sedation drugs, including propofol, in children <3 years of age or during the third trimester of pregnancy may adversely affect neurodevelopment.750 753 In animals, use for >3 hours of anesthetic and sedation drugs that block N-methyl-d-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptors and/or potentiate GABA activity leads to widespread neuronal apoptosis in the brain and long-term deficits in cognition and behavior;750 751 752 753 clinical relevance to humans is unknown.750 Some evidence suggests similar deficits may occur in children following repeated or prolonged exposure to anesthesia early in life.750 752 Some evidence also indicates that a single, relatively brief exposure to general anesthesia in generally healthy children is unlikely to cause clinically detectable deficits in global cognitive function or serious behavioral disorders.750 751 752 Most studies to date have substantial limitations; further research needed to fully characterize effects, particularly for prolonged or repeated exposures and in more vulnerable populations (e.g., less healthy children).750 Consider benefits and potential risks when determining the timing of elective procedures requiring anesthesia.750 FDA states that medically necessary procedures should not be delayed or avoided.750 753

Geriatric Use

Lower dosages may be required for anesthesia and other indications.1 2

Avoid rapid (single or repeated) IV (“bolus”) administration during general anesthesia or MAC sedation to minimize the risk of adverse effects, including cardiorespiratory depression (e.g., hypotension, apnea, airway obstruction, oxyhemoglobin desaturation).1 2

Hepatic Impairment

Long-term propofol therapy not evaluated to date.1 2

Renal Impairment

Long-term propofol therapy not evaluated to date.1 2

Common Adverse Effects

Common adverse reactions (>1%): bradycardia, arrhythmia, tachycardia, hypotension, hypertension, decreased cardiac output, movement, apnea, respiratory acidosis during weaning, rash, pruritus, burning/stinging or pain at injection site, hyperlipemia.1

Drug Interactions

Metabolized mainly by CYP2B6 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C9.179

Inhibits CYP isoenzymes 1A1, 1A2, 2B1, 2C9, 2D6, 2E1, and 3A4.72 73

Drugs Metabolized by or Affecting Hepatic Microsomal Enzymes

Possibility of interactions; however, because of the increased value for hepatic extraction (50 µM) of propofol,179 there have been relatively few clinically important interactions with drugs metabolized by or affecting CYP isoenzymes.71 192

Specific Drugs

Drug

Interaction

Comments

Anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin)

IV administration of lipids (e.g., those contained in the propofol emulsion) may decrease response to warfarin in patients with malabsorptive states (e.g., Crohn’s disease)70

Use heparin for initial anticoagulation in patients with malabsorptive states receiving high-dose lipid emulsions;70 if warfarin is given, monitor INR daily70

CNS depressants (e.g., benzodiazepines, opiates, inhalation anesthetics [e.g., nitrous oxide, isoflurane])

Increased sedative, anesthetic, and cardiorespiratory depressant effects of propofol1 2

Reduce induction dose of propofol in patients receiving premedication with IV or IM opiates or in those receiving opiates in combination with sedatives (e.g., benzodiazepines, barbiturates, chloral hydrate, droperidol)1 2

Reduce infusion rate of propofol during maintenance of anesthesia or sedation in those receiving CNS depressants concomitantly1 2

Droperidol

Increased frequency of postoperative nausea and vomiting reported74

Fentanyl

Possibility of severe bradycardia in pediatric patients1 2

Midazolam

Synergistic effect (possibly at GABAA receptors in the brain), producing induction of anesthesia and sedation78 79 80

Free plasma concentrations of midazolam increased by about 20%; no apparent effect on free concentrations of propofol79

Neuromuscular blocking agents (e.g., succinylcholine, nondepolarizing skeletal muscle relaxants)

No clinically important changes in the onset, intensity, or duration of action of commonly used neuromuscular blocking agents1 2 8

Opiate agonists

May increase the anesthetic/sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of propofol1

In pediatric patients, concomitant administration of fentanyl and propofol may result in serious bradycardia1

Blood concentrations of opiates increased by 10–20%75

Blood concentrations of propofol increased by up to 22% with alfentanil use75

Variations in blood concentrations of propofol and opiates are unlikely to be clinically important;75 however, sedation and analgesia may be greater with the combination than with either agent alone76

Propofol Pharmacokinetics

Absorption

Onset

Following a single IV injection, onset as determined by time to unconsciousness (i.e., loss of response to voice command) usually ranges from 15–30 seconds and depends on the administration rate.6 18 20 117

Duration

Following a single rapid IV injection, duration of action usually is about 5–10 minutes.20 117

Plasma Concentrations

Following a single rapid IV injection, most patients will awaken as blood propofol concentrations decline to approximately 1 mcg/mL; improvement of psychomotor performance (as measured by patient response to verbal command) usually occurs at concentrations of 0.5–0.6 mcg/mL.9

Distribution

Extent

Highly lipophilic; rapidly distributed from plasma into body tissues, including the CNS.5 6 9 10 117 Following IV administration, widely distributed, initially to highly perfused tissues (e.g., brain), then to lean muscle tissue, and finally to fat tissue.5 6 7 9 117 Equilibration between blood and CSF occurs within about 2–3 minutes.5 6 9 10 117

Readily crosses the placenta.1 2 6 19 31 32

Distributed into milk in low concentrations.1 2 6 19

Plasma Protein Binding

Approximately 95–99% (mainly albumin and hemoglobin).5 6 9 18 Binding appears to be independent of plasma propofol concentration.6

Elimination

Metabolism

Rapidly and extensively metabolized in the liver1 2 5 6 8 9 20 179 by CYP2B6 and to a lesser extent by CYP2C9.179

Elimination Route

Excreted mainly in urine, principally as sulfate and/or glucuronide conjugates;6 9 10 20 <0.3% of a dose is eliminated unchanged in urine,5 6 9 10 and <2% of a dose is eliminated in feces.8

Half-life

Triphasic;1 2 5 6 10 45 following a single rapid injection or a continuous infusion, half-life averages 1.8–9.5 minutes in the initial distribution phase, 21–70 minutes in the second redistribution phase, and 1.5–31 hours in the terminal elimination phase.5 6 8 9 45 46

Terminal plasma half-life may not affect clinical outcome as substantially as the distribution half-life does, since rapid awakening from anesthesia occurs once blood propofol concentrations decrease below the range required for hypnosis.6 7

Special Populations

In geriatric patients, clearance may be reduced substantially,5 6 8 9 10 18 106 possibly because of decreased hepatic metabolism resulting from decreased hepatic blood flow.6

Obese patients have a substantially higher clearance than leaner individuals; mean total body clearance appears to be proportional to body weight.5 6 180 192

Chronic renal failure or chronic hepatic cirrhosis does not appear to affect pharmacokinetics of propofol;1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 not studied in patients with acute renal or hepatic failure.1

Stability

Storage

Parenteral

Injectable Emulsion

4–25°C depending on the preparation.1 2 3 Do not freeze.1

Actions

Advice to Patients

Additional Information

The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. represents that the information provided in the accompanying monograph was formulated with a reasonable standard of care, and in conformity with professional standards in the field. Readers are advised that decisions regarding use of drugs are complex medical decisions requiring the independent, informed decision of an appropriate health care professional, and that the information contained in the monograph is provided for informational purposes only. The manufacturer’s labeling should be consulted for more detailed information. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc. does not endorse or recommend the use of any drug. The information contained in the monograph is not a substitute for medical care.

Preparations

Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.

Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.

* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name

Propofol

Routes

Dosage Forms

Strengths

Brand Names

Manufacturer

Parenteral

Injectable emulsion, for IV use

10 mg/mL*

Diprivan Emulsion (available as ready-to-use single patient vials)

Fresenius Kabi

Propofol Injectable Emulsion

AHFS DI Essentials™. © Copyright 2024, Selected Revisions June 10, 2024. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

† Off-label: Use is not currently included in the labeling approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.

References

1. Fresenius Kabi. Diprivan (propofol) injectable emulsion for IV administration prescribing information. Lake Zurich, IL; 2022 Aug.

2. Hospira. Propofol injectable emulsion for IV administration prescribing information. Lake Forest, IL; 2023 Feb.

3. Sagent. Propofol injectable emulsion for IV administration prescribing information. Schaumberg, IL; 2021 Sept.

5. Fulton B, Sorkin EM. Propofol: an overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation. Drugs. 1995; 50: 636-57. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8536552?dopt=AbstractPlus

6. Bryson, HM, Fulton BR et al. Propofol: an update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation. Drugs. 1995; 50:513-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8521772?dopt=AbstractPlus

7. Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M. Propofol: an update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology. 1994; 81:1005-43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7943815?dopt=AbstractPlus

8. Sebel PS, Lowdon JD. Propofol: a new intravenous anesthetic. Anesthesiology. 1989; 71:260-77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2667401?dopt=AbstractPlus

9. Larijani GE, Gratz I, Afshar M et al. Clinical pharmacology of propofol: an intravenous anesthetic agent. DICP. 1989; 23:743-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2683416?dopt=AbstractPlus

10. Langley MS and Heel RC. Propofol: a review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic. Drugs. 1988; 35:334-72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3292208?dopt=AbstractPlus

11. Bailey LC, Tang KT, Rogozinski BA. Effect of syringe filter and IV administration set on delivery of propofol emulsion. AJHP. 1991; 48:2627-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1814205?dopt=AbstractPlus

12. Michaels, MR, Stauffer et al. Propofol compatibility with other intravenous drug products—two new methods of evaluating IV emulsion compatibility. Ann Pharmacother. 1996; 30:228-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8833555?dopt=AbstractPlus

13. Trissel LA, Gilbert DL, Marinez JF. Compatibility of propofol injectable emulsion with selected drugs during simulated Y-site administration. AJHP. 54: 1287-92.

14. Hadzija BW and Lubarsky DA. Compatibility of etomidate, thiopental sodium, and propofol injections with drugs commonly administered during induction of anesthesia. AJHP. 1995; 52:997-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7641039?dopt=AbstractPlus

15. Chernin EL, Stewart JT, Smiler B. Stability of thiopental sodium and propofol in polypropylene syringes at 23 and 4°. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1996; 53:1576-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8809279?dopt=AbstractPlus

16. Henthorn TK. Pharmacokinetics of intravenous induction agents. In: Bowdle TA, Horita A, Kharasch ED. The pharmacologic basis of anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:307-18.

17. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OHG, Suter PM. The nonhypnotic therapeutic applications of propofol. Anesthesiology. 1994; 80:642-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7908179?dopt=AbstractPlus

18. Wagner BKJ, O’Hara DA. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sedatives and analgesics in the treatment of agitated critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997; 33:426-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9435992?dopt=AbstractPlus

19. Dailland P, Cockshott ID, Lirzin JD et al. Intravenous propofol during cesarean section: placental transfer, concentrations in breast milk, and neonatal effects. A preliminary study. Anesthesiology. 1989; 71:827-34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2589672?dopt=AbstractPlus

20. Carmichael FJ, Haas DA. General Anesthetics. In: Kalant H and Roschlau WH, eds. Principles of Medical Pharmacology. 6th edition. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998: 278-92.

22. Potyk DK, Raudaskoski P. Overview of anesthesia for primary care physicians. West J Med. 1998; 168:517-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9655993?dopt=AbstractPlus

23. White PF and Negus JB. Sedative infusions during local and regional anesthesia: a comparison of midazolam and propofol. J Clin Anesth. 1991; 3:32-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2007040?dopt=AbstractPlus

24. Taylor E, Ghouri AF, White PF. Midazolam in combination with propofol for sedation during local anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 1992; 4:213-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1610577?dopt=AbstractPlus

25. Osborne GA, Rudkin GE, Jarvis DA et al. Intra-operative patient controlled sedation and patient attitude to control. A crossover comparison of patient preference for patient-controlled propofol and propofol by continuous infusion. Anesthesia. 1994; 49:287- 92.

26. Roseveare C, Seavell C, Patel P et al. Patient-controlled sedation and analgesia, using propofol and alfentanil, during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 1998; 30:768-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9932756?dopt=AbstractPlus

27. Oei-Lim VL, Kalkman CJ, Makkes PC et al. Patient-controlled versus anesthesiologist-controlled conscious sedation with propofol for dental treatment in anxious patients. Anesth Analg. 1998; 86:967- 72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9585278?dopt=AbstractPlus

28. Zacharias M, Bhridgman J, Parkinson R. Two methods of administration of propofol for dental sedation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998; 36:19-23. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9578250?dopt=AbstractPlus

29. Herrick IA, Gelb AW, Tseng PS et al. Patient-controlled sedation using propofol during interventional neuroradiologic procedures. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1997; 9:237-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9239586?dopt=AbstractPlus

30. Ganapathy S, Herrick IA, Gelb AW et al. Propofol patient-controlled sedation during hip or knee arthroplasty in elderly patients. Can J Anaesth. 1997; 44:385-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9104520?dopt=AbstractPlus

31. Gin T, Gregory MA, Chan K et al. Maternal and fetal levels of propofol at caesarean section. Anesth Intensive Care. 1990; 18:180-4

32. Gin, T, Yau G, Gregory MA. Propofol during cesarean section. Anesthesiology.1990;73:789. Letter.

33. Shapiro BA, Warren J, Egol AB et al. Practice parameters for intravenous analgesia and sedation for adult patients in the intensive care unit: an executive summary. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23:1596-1600. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7664563?dopt=AbstractPlus

34. Carrasco G, Cabré L, Sobrepere G et al. Synergistic sedation with propofol and midazolam in intensive care patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26:844-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9590313?dopt=AbstractPlus

35. McCollam JS, O’Neil MG, Norcross ED et al. Continuous infusions of lorazepam, midazolam, and propofol for sedation of the critically ill surgery trauma patient: a prospective, randomized comparison. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27: 2454-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10579264?dopt=AbstractPlus

36. Weinbroum AA, Halpern P, Rudick V et al. Midazolam versus propofol for long-term sedation in the ICU: a randomized prospective comparison. Intensive Care Med. 1997; 23:1258-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9470082?dopt=AbstractPlus

37. Ronan KP, Gallagher TJ, George B et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1995; 23:286-93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7867354?dopt=AbstractPlus

38. Shafer A. Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensivecare unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26:947-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9590327?dopt=AbstractPlus

39. Barrientos-Vega R, Mar Sénchez-Soria M, Morales-Garcia C et al. Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol: impact on weaning and costs. Crit Care Med. 1997; 25:33-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8989173?dopt=AbstractPlus

40. Burns AM, Shelly MP, Park GR. The use of sedative agents in critically ill patients. Drugs. 1992; 43:507-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1377117?dopt=AbstractPlus

41. Aitkenhead AR, Pepperman ML, Willatts SM et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in critically ill patients. Lancet. 1989; 2:704-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2570958?dopt=AbstractPlus

42. Wilson E, David A, Mackenzie N et al. Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth. 1990; 64:48-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2302376?dopt=AbstractPlus

43. Wilson E, Mackenzie N, Grant IS. A comparison of propofol and midazolam by infusion to provide sedation in patients who receive spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1988; 43(Suppl):91-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3259111?dopt=AbstractPlus

44. Smith I, Monk TG, White PF et al. Propofol infusion during regional anesthesia: sedative, amnestic, and anxiolytic properties. Anesth Analg. 1994; 79:313-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7639371?dopt=AbstractPlus

45. Bailie GR, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ et al. Pharmacokinetics of propofol during and after long-term continuous infusion for maintenance of sedation in ICU patients. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 68:486-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1642937?dopt=AbstractPlus

46. Albanese J, Martin C, Lacarelle B et al. Pharmacokinetics of long-term propofol infusion used for sedation in ICU patients. Anesthesiology. 1990; 73:214-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2382846?dopt=AbstractPlus

47. Carrasco G, Molina R, Costa J et al. Propofol vs midazolam in short-, medium-, and long-term sedation of critically ill patients. Chest. 1993; 103:557-64. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8432154?dopt=AbstractPlus

48. Borgeat A. Propofol: pro- or anticonvulsant? Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl.1997; 15:17-20.

49. Brown LA and Levin GM. Role of propofol in refractory status epilepticus. Ann Pharmacother. 1998; 32:1053-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9793598?dopt=AbstractPlus

50. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Saiah M et al. Subhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties. Anesth Analg. 1992; 74:539-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1554120?dopt=AbstractPlus

51. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Forni M et al. Adjuvant propofol enables better control of nausea and emesis secondary to chemotherapy for breast cancer. Can J Anaesth. 1994; 11:1117-9.

52. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Wilder-Smith CH et al. Propofol improves patient comfort during cisplatin chemotherapy: A pilot study. Oncology. 1993; 50:456-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8233287?dopt=AbstractPlus

53. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Saiah M et al. Subhypnotic doses of propofol relieve pruritus induced by epidural and intrathecal morphine. Anesthesiology. 1992; 76:510-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1550275?dopt=AbstractPlus

54. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Mentha G. Subhypnotic doses of propofol relieve pruritus associated with liver disease. Gastroenterology. 1993; 104:244-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8419248?dopt=AbstractPlus

55. Borgeat A, Savioz D, Mentha G et al. Intractable cholestatic pruritus after liver transplantation—management with propofol. Transplantation. 1994; 58:727-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7940696?dopt=AbstractPlus

56. Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith O, Mentha G. Propofol and cholestatic pruritus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992; 87:672-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1595661?dopt=AbstractPlus

57. Follette JW, Farley WJ. Anesthesiologist addicted to propofol. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77:817-818. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1416179?dopt=AbstractPlus

58. Drummer OH. A fatality due to propofol poisoning. J Forensic Sci. 1992; 37:1186-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1506835?dopt=AbstractPlus

59. Deer TR and Rich GF. Propofol tolerance in a pediatric patient. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77:828-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1416184?dopt=AbstractPlus

60. Setlock MA, Palmisano BW, Berens RJ. Tolerance to propofol generally does not develop in pediatric patients undergoing radiation therapy. Anesthesiology. 1996; 85:207-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8694366?dopt=AbstractPlus

61. Mayhew JF, Abouleish AE. Lack of tolerance to propofol. Anesthesiology. 1996; 85:1209-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8916844?dopt=AbstractPlus

62. Fassoulaki A, Farinotti R, Mantz J et al. Does tolerance develop to the anaesthetic effects of propofol in rats? Br J Anaesth.1994; 72:127-8

63. Larsson JE and Wahlstrom G. Age-dependent development of acute tolerance to propofol and its distribution in a pharmacokinetic compartment-independent rat model. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996; 40:734-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8836271?dopt=AbstractPlus

64. Buckley PM. Propofol in patients needing long-term sedation in intensive care: an assessment of the development of tolerance: A pilot study. Intensive Care Med. 1997; 23:969-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9347369?dopt=AbstractPlus

65. Zacny JP, Lichtor JL, Zaragoza JG et al. Assessing the behavioral effects and abuse potential of propofol bolus injections in healthy volunteers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1993; 32:45-57. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8486084?dopt=AbstractPlus

66. Zacny JP, Lichtor JL, Thompson W et al. Propofol at a subanesthetic dose may have abuse potential in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77:544-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8368554?dopt=AbstractPlus

67. Ward CF. Substance Abuse: now and for some time to come. Anesthesiology. 1992; 77:619-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1416157?dopt=AbstractPlus

68. Cammarano WB, Pittet JF, Weitz S et al. Acute withdrawal syndrome related to the administration of analgesic and sedative medications in adult intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26:676-84. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9559604?dopt=AbstractPlus

69. Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seifrling RA et al. Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA. 2000; 283:1451-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10732935?dopt=AbstractPlus

70. MacLaren R, Wachsman BA, Swift DK et al. Warfarin resistance associated with intravenous lipid administration: discussion of propofol and review of the literature. Pharmacotherapy. 1997; 6:1331-7.

71. Guitton J, Buronfosse T, Desage M et al. Possible involvement of multiple human cytochrome P450 isoforms in the liver metabolism of propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1998; 80:788-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9771309?dopt=AbstractPlus

72. Chen TL, Ueng TH, Chen SH et al. Human cytochrome P450 mono- oxygenase system is suppressed by propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1995; 74:558-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7772432?dopt=AbstractPlus

73. McKillop D, Wild MJ, Butters CJ et al. Effects of propofol of human hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 activities. Xenobiotica. 1998; 28:845-53.

74. Wagner BK, Berman SL, Devitt PA et al. Retrospective analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting to determine antiemetic activity of droperidol added to propofol: a possible drug interaction. Pharmacotherapy. 1994; 14:586-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7997392?dopt=AbstractPlus

75. Vuyk J. TCI :supplementation and drug interactions. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53(Suppl 1):35-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9640113?dopt=AbstractPlus

76. Pavlin DJ, Coda B, Shen DD et al. Effects of combining propofol and alfentanil on ventilation, analgesia, sedation, and emesis in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1996; 84:23-37. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8572340?dopt=AbstractPlus

77. Janicki PK, James MF, Erskine WA. Propofol inhibits enzymatic degradation of alfentanil and sufentanil by isolated liver microsomes in vitro. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 68:311-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1532122?dopt=AbstractPlus

78. McClune S, McKay AC, Wright PM et al. Synergistic interaction between midazolam and propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1992; 69:240-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1389840?dopt=AbstractPlus

79. Teh J, Short G, Wong J et al. Pharmacokinetic interactions between midazolam and propofol: an infusion study. Br J Anaesth. 1994; 72:62-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8110554?dopt=AbstractPlus

80. Short TG and Chui PT. Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination. Br J Anaesth. 1991; 67:539-45.

81. Au J, Walker WS, Scott DHT. Withdrawal syndrome after propofol infusion. Anaesthesia. 1990; 45:741-2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2122764?dopt=AbstractPlus

82. Imray JMcG, Hay A. Withdrawal syndrome after propofol. Anaesthesia. 1991; 46:704. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1887999?dopt=AbstractPlus

83. Odell M. Propofol abuse. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1999; 29:539.

84. Kumar AN, Schwartz DE, Lim KC. Propofol-induced pancreatitis. Chest. 1999; 115:1198-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10208230?dopt=AbstractPlus

85. Dönmez A, Sener M, Candan S et al. Can we blame propofol for pancreatitis? Pharmacotherapy. 1999; 19:1181-2.

86. Wingfield TW. Pancreatitis after propofol administration: is there a relationship? Anesthesiology.1996; 84:236. Letter.

87. Goodale DB and Suljaga-Petchel K. Pancreatitis after propofol administration: is there a relationship? Anesthesiology. 1996; 84:236-7. Letter.

88. Leisure GS, O’Flaherty J, Green L et al. Propofol and postoperative pancreatitis. Anesthesiology. 1996; 84:224-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8572338?dopt=AbstractPlus

89. McLeskey CH, Walawander CA, Nahrwold ML et al. Adverse events in a multicenter phase IV study of propofol: evaluation by anesthesiologists and postanesthesia care unit nurses. Anesth Analg. 1993; 77(Suppl):S3-S9.

90. Cray SH, Robinson BH, Cox PN. Lactic acidemia and bradyarrhythmia in a child sedated with propofol. Crit Care Med.1998; 26:2087-92 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9875925?dopt=AbstractPlus

91. Susla GM. Propofol toxicity in critically ill pediatric patients: show us the proof. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26:1959-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9875903?dopt=AbstractPlus

92. Borgeat A, Dessibourg C, Popovic V et al. Propofol and spontaneous movements: an EEG study. Anesthesiology. 1991; 74:24-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1986658?dopt=AbstractPlus

93. Begemann M, Rowan AJ, Tuhrim S. Treatment of refractory complex- partial status epilepticus with propofol: case report. Epilepsia. 2000; 41:105-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10643932?dopt=AbstractPlus

94. Hertzog JH, Campbell JK, Dalton HJ et al. Propofol anesthesia for invasive procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children: experience in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatrics. 1999; 103:E30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10049986?dopt=AbstractPlus

95. Lowrie L, Weiss AH, Lacombe C. The pediatric sedation unit: a mechanism for pediatric sedation. Pediatrics.1998; 102:E30

96. Pepperman ML, Macrae D. A comparison of propofol and other sedative use in paediatric intensive care in the United Kingdom. Paediatr Anaesth. 1997; 7:143-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9188116?dopt=AbstractPlus

97. Reed MD, Yamashita TS, Marx CM et al. A pharmacokinetically based propofol dosing strategy for sedation of the critically ill, mechanically ventilated pediatric patient. Crit Care Med. 1996; 24:1473-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8797618?dopt=AbstractPlus

98. Reed MD and Blumer JL. Propofol bashing: the time to stop is now! Crit Care Med.1996; 24:175-6. Letter.

99. Havel CJ Jr, Strait RT, Hennes H. A clinical trial of propofol vs midazolam for procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:989-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10530656?dopt=AbstractPlus

100. Merola C, Albarracin C, Lebowitz P et al. An audit of adverse events in children sedated with chloral hydrate or propofol during imaging studies. Paediatr Anaesth. 1995; 5:375-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8597970?dopt=AbstractPlus

101. Sautou-Miranda V, Levadux, E et al. Compatibility of propofol diluted in 5% glucose with glass and plastics (polypropylene, polyvinylchloride) containers. Int J Pharm. 1996; 130:251-5.

103. Sklar GE. Propofol and postoperative infections. Ann Pharmacother. 1997; 31:1521-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9416392?dopt=AbstractPlus

104. Newton DW. Introduction: physiochemical determinants of incompatibility and instability drug for injection and infusion. In: Trissel LA. Handbook on injectable drugs. 3rd ed. Bethesda, MD: American Society of Hospital Pharmacists, Inc; 1983:xi-xxi.

105. Barnard EA, Skolnick P, Olsen RW et al. International union of pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of γ-aminobutyric acidA receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev. 1998; 50:291-313. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9647870?dopt=AbstractPlus

106. Kirkpatrick T, Cockshott ID, Douglas EJ et al. Pharmacokinetics of propofol (diprivan) in elderly patients. Br J Anaesth. 1988; 60:146-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3257879?dopt=AbstractPlus

107. Schnider TW, Minto CF, Shafer SL et al. The influence of age on propofol pharmacodynamics. Anesthesiology. 1999; 90:1502-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10360845?dopt=AbstractPlus

108. Dundee JW, Robinson FP, McCollum JS et al. Sensitivity to propofol in the elderly. Anaesthesia. 1986; 41:482-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3487990?dopt=AbstractPlus

109. Soyka M and Schutz CG. Propofol dependency. Addiction. 1997; 92:1369-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9489054?dopt=AbstractPlus

110. Lazar ER, Jolly DT, Tam YK. Propofol and thiopental in a 1:1 volume mixture is chemically stable. Anesth Analg. 1998; 86:422-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9459260?dopt=AbstractPlus

111. Prankerd RJ, Jones RD. Physiochemical compatibility of propofol with thiopental sodium. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1996; 53:2606-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8913389?dopt=AbstractPlus

112. Duvaldestin P. Pharmacokinetics in intravenous anesthetic practice. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1981; 6:61-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6113908?dopt=AbstractPlus

113. Crowther J, Hrazdil J, Jolly DT. Growth of microorganisms in propofol, thiopental, and a 1:1 mixture of propofol and thiopental. Anesth Analg. 1996; 82:475-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8623946?dopt=AbstractPlus

114. Chernin EL, Smiler B. Propofol-thiopental combination: implications for cost savings and clinical use. Am J Anesthesiol. 1997; 24:251-3.

116. Hales TG, Olsen RW. Basic pharmacology of intravenous induction agents. In: Bowdle TA, Horita A, Kharasch ED. The pharmacologic basis of anesthesiology.New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:295-306.

117. White PF. Propofol: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Semin Anesth. 1988; 7(Suppl):4-20.

118. Fragen RJ. Clinical pharmacology and applications of intravenous anesthetic induction agents. In: Bowdle TA, Horita A, Kharasch ED. The pharmacologic basis of anesthesiology. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1994:319-36.

119. Eriksson H, Korttila K. Recovery profile after desflurane with or without ondanestron compared with propofol in patients undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopy. Anesthesia Analg. 1996; 82:533-8.

120. Patel N, Smith CE, Pinchak AC et al. Desflurane is not associated with faster operating room exit times in outpatients. J Clin Anes. 1996; 8:130-5.

121. Song D, Joshi GP, White PF. Fast track eligibility after ambulatory anesthesia: a comparison of desflurane, sevoflurane, and propofol. Anesth Analg. 1998; 86:267-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9459231?dopt=AbstractPlus

122. Raeder JC, Mjaland O, Aasbo V et al. Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystecomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998; 42:106-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9527731?dopt=AbstractPlus

123. Ashworth J, Smith I. Comparison of desflurane with isoflurane or propofol in spontaneously breathing ambulatory patients. Anesth Analg. 1998; 87:312-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9706922?dopt=AbstractPlus

124. Van Hemelrijck J, Smith I, White PF. Use of desflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol and nitrous oxide. Anesthesiology. 1991; 75: 197-203.

125. Rapp SE, Conahan TJ, Pavlin DJ et al. Comparison of desflurane with propofol in outpatients undergoing peripheral orthopedic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1992; 75:572-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1530170?dopt=AbstractPlus

126. Lebenbom-Mansour MH, Pandit SK, Kothary SP et al. Desflurane versus propofol anesthesia: a comparative analysis in outpatients. Anesth Analg. 1993; 76:936-41. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8484548?dopt=AbstractPlus

127. Kurpiers EM, Scharine J, Lovell SL. Cost-effective anesthesia: desflurane versus propofol in outpatient surgery. AANA J. 1996; 64:69-75. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8928604?dopt=AbstractPlus

128. Tang J, White PF, Wender RH et al. Fast-track office-based anesthesia: a comparison of propofol versus desflurane with antiemetic prophylaxis in spontaneously breathing patients. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92:95-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11133608?dopt=AbstractPlus

129. Wrigley SR, Fairfield JE, Jones RM et al. Induction and recovery characteristics of desflurane in day case patients: a comparison with propofol. 1991; 46:615-22.

131. Nguyen AT. Monitored Anesthesia Care. Internet J Health. 2000; 1:.

132. Walder B, Elia N, Henzi I et al. A lack of evidence of superiority of propofol versus midazolam for sedation in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a qualitative and quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2001;92:975-83.

133. Young C, Knudsen N, Hilton A et al. Sedation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000; 28:854-66.

134. Prasad A, Worrall BB, Bertram EH et al. Propofol and midazolam in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Epilepsia. 2001; 42:380-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11442156?dopt=AbstractPlus

135. Hall RI, Sandam D, Cardinal P et al. Propofol vs midazolam for ICU sedation: a Canadian multicenter randomized trial. 2001; 119:1151-9.

136. Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM) in collaboration with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and in alliance with the American College of Chest Physicians. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 59:150-78.

137. Chapman MG, Smith M, Hirsch NP. Status epilepticus. Anaesthesia. 2001;56:648-59.

138. Blakey SA, Hixson-Wallace JA. Clinical significance of rare and benign side effects: propofol and green urine. Pharmacotherapy. 2000; 20:1120- 2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10999506?dopt=AbstractPlus

139. MacPherson RD. Pharmaceutics for the anesthetist. Anaesthesia. 2001; 56:965-79.

140. Bray RJ. Propofol infusion for ICU sedation in children. Anesthesia. 2002; 57:521.

141. Tobias JD. Sedation analgesia in paediatric intensive care units. Pediatric Drugs. 1999; 1:109-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10937446?dopt=AbstractPlus

142. Bray RJ. Fatal myocardial failure associated with a propofol infusion in a child. Anaesthesia. 1995; 50:94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7702174?dopt=AbstractPlus

143. Strickland RA, Murray MJ. Fatal metabolic acidosis in a pediatric patient receiving an infusion of propofol in the intensive care unit: is there a relationship? Crit Care Med. 1995; 23:405-9.

144. Picard P, Tramèr MR. Prevention of pain on injection with propofol: a quantitative systematic review. Anesth Analg. 2000; 90:963-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10735808?dopt=AbstractPlus

145. Trapani G. Altomare C, Liso G et al. Propofol in anesthesia: mechanism of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug delivery. Curr Med Chem. 2000; 7:249-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10637364?dopt=AbstractPlus

146. Goodale D. Dear healthcare provider letter regarding safety concerns about propofol use in pediatric patients in intensive care units. Wilmington DE: AstraZeneca; 2001 Mar.

147. AstraZeneca. Data on file. Trial 68 Informational Abstract.

148. Evers AS, Crowder CM. General Anesthetics. In: Hardman JG, Gilman AG, Limbird LE, eds. Goodman and Gilman’s The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2001: 337-44.

149. Donnelly AJ, Shafer AL. Perioperative care. In: Young LL, Koda-Kimble MA, eds. Applied Therapeutics: The clinical use of drugs. 6th ed. Vancouver WA: Applied Therapeutics, Inc; 1995:8-1-8-24.

150. Tanelian DL, Kosek P, Mody I et al. The role of the GABAA receptor/chloride channel complex in anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1993; 78:757-76. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8385426?dopt=AbstractPlus

151. Fombeur PO, Tilleul PR, Beaussier MJ et al. Cost-effectiveness of propofol anesthesia using target-controlled infusion compared with a standard regimen using desflurane. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2002; 59:1344-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12132561?dopt=AbstractPlus

152. Lok IH, Chan MT, Chan DL et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing patient-controlled sedation using propofol and alfentanil and physician-administered sedation using diazepam and pethidine during transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval. Hum Reprod. 2002; 17:2101-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12151444?dopt=AbstractPlus

153. Leslie K, Absalom A, Kenny GN. Closed loop control of sedation for colonoscopy using the bispectral index. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57:693-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12109414?dopt=AbstractPlus

154. Brodmerkel GJ Jr. Patient-maintained sedation for ERCP with a target- controlled infusion of propofol: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002; 55:966. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12024171?dopt=AbstractPlus

155. Henderson F, Absalom AR, Kenny GN. Patient-maintained propofol sedation: a follow up safety study using a modified system in volunteers. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57:387-90. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11949642?dopt=AbstractPlus

156. Aquilina A, Groves J. A combined technique utilising regional anaesthesia and target-controlled sedation in a patient with myotonic dystrophy. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:385-6.

157. Osborne GA, Rudkin GE, Jarvis DA et al. Intra-operative patient- controlled sedation and patient attitude to control: a crossover comparison of patient preference for patient-controlled propofol and propofol by continuous infusion. Anaesthesia. 1994; 49:287-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8179132?dopt=AbstractPlus

158. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP et al. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation: comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia. 1992; 47:376-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1599059?dopt=AbstractPlus

159. Shafer A. Complications of sedation with midazolam in the intensive care unit and a comparison with other sedative regimens. Crit Care Med. 1998; 26:947-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9590327?dopt=AbstractPlus

160. Barrientos-Vega R, Mar Sanchez-Soria M, Morales-Garcia C et al. Prolonged sedation of critically ill patients with midazolam or propofol; impact on weaning and costs. Crit Care Med. 1997; 25:33-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8989173?dopt=AbstractPlus

161. Burns AM, Shelly MP, Park GR. The use of sedative agents in critically ill patients. Drugs. 1992; 43:507-15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1377117?dopt=AbstractPlus

162. Aitkenhead AR, Pepperman ML, Willatts SM et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in critically ill patients. Lancet. 1989; 2:704-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2570958?dopt=AbstractPlus

163. Food and Drug Administration. Sulfiting agents; labeling in drugs for human use; warning statements. [21 FR Part 201] Fed Regist. 1986; 51:43900-5.

164. Parke TJ, Stevens JE, Rice AS et al. Metabolic acidosis and fatal myocardial failure after propofol infusion in children: five case reports. BMJ. 1992; 305:613-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1393073?dopt=AbstractPlus

165. Leibowitz AB, O’Sullivan P, Iberti TJ. Intravenous fat emulsions and the pancreas: a review. Mt Sinai J Med. 1992;59:38-42. Review.

166. Toskes PP. Hyperlipidemic pancreatitis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1990; 19:783-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2269517?dopt=AbstractPlus

167. Possidente CJ, Rogers FB, Osler TM et al. Elevated pancreatic enzymes after extended propofol therapy. Pharmacotherapy. 1998; 8:653-5.

168. Brown LA, Levin GM. Role of propofol in refractory status epilepticus. Ann Pharmacother. 1998; 32:1053-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9793598?dopt=AbstractPlus

169. Stecker MM, Kramer TH, Raps EC et al. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with propofol: clinical and pharmacokinetic findings. Epilepsia. 1998; 39:18-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9578008?dopt=AbstractPlus

170. Crawford M, Pollock J, Anderson K et al. Comparison of midazolam with propofol for sedation in outpatient bronchoscopy. Br J Anesth. 1993; 70:419-22.

171. Clarkson K, Power CK, O’Connell et al. A comparative evaluation of propofol and midazolam as sedative agents in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest. 1993; 104:1029-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8404160?dopt=AbstractPlus

172. Beattie C. History and principles of anesthesiology. In: Hardman JG, Gilman AG, Limbird LE, eds. Goodman and Gilman’s The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed. McGraw-Hill; 2001: 321-35.

173. Tramer MR, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Propofol and bradycardia:causation, frequency, and severity. Br J Anesth. 1997:642-51.

174. Osborne GA, Rudkin GE, Jarvis DA et al. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation and patient attitude to control. Anaesthesia.1994;49:287-92.

175. Rudkin GE, Osborne GA, Finn BP et al. Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with patient-controlled midazolam. Anaesthesia. 1992;47:376-81.

176. Glen JB. The development of ’Diprifusor’: a TCI system for propofol. Anaesthesia. 1998; 53(Suppl 1):13-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9640110?dopt=AbstractPlus

177. White M, Kenny, GN. Intravenous propofol anaesthesia using a computerised infusion system. Anaesthesia. 1992; 45:633-4.

178. Fredman B, Nathanson MH, Smith I et al. Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol. Anesth Analg. 1995:81:823-8.

179. Court MH, Duan SX, Hesse LM et al. Cytochrome P-450 2B6 is responsible for interindividual variability of propofol hydroxylation by human liver microsomes. Anesthesiology. 2001; 94:110-19. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11135730?dopt=AbstractPlus

180. Servin F, Farinotti R, Haberer JP et al. Propofol infusion for maintenance of anesthesia in morbidly obese patients receiving nitrous oxide. A clinical and pharmacokinetic study. Anesthesiology. 1993; 78: 657-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8466066?dopt=AbstractPlus

181. Reviewers’ comments (personal observations).

182. Baxter, Deerfield, IL: Personal communication.

183. Beyer R, Seyde WC. [Propofol versus midazolam. Long-term sedation in the intensive care unit]. (German; with English abstract). Anaesthesist. 1992 41:335-41

184. Ronan KP, Gallagher TJ, George B et al. Comparison of propofol and midazolam for sedation in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:286-93.

185. Gottardis M, Khunl-Brady KS, Koller Wet al. Effect of prolonged sedation with propofol on serum triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations. Br J Anaesth. 1989 Apr;62:393-6.

186. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L et al. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 1997; 86:836-47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9105228?dopt=AbstractPlus

187. O’Donnell NG, McSharry CP, Wilkinson PC et al. Comparison of the inhibitory effect of propofol, thiopentone and midazolam on neutrophil polarization in vitro in the presence or absence of human serum albumin. Br J Anaesth. 1992;69:70-4.

188. Heath PJ, Ogg TW, Gilks WR. Recovery after day-case anaesthesia: a 24-hour comparison of recovery after thiopentone or propofol anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1990; 45:911-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2252183?dopt=AbstractPlus

189. Doze VA, Westphal LM, White PF. Comparison of propofol with methohexital for outpatient anesthesia. Anaesth Analg. 1986; 65:1189-95.

190. Heath PJ, Kennedy DJ, Ogg TW et al. Which intravenous agent for day surgery? A comparison of propofol, thiopentone, methohexitone and etomidate. Anaesthesia. 1988; 43:365-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3261140?dopt=AbstractPlus

191. Chao TC, Lo DS, Chui PP et al. The first fatal 2,6-di-isopropylphenol (propofol) poisoning in Singapore: a case report. Forensic Sci Int. 1994; 25:1-7.

192. AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE. Personal communication.

193. Knell PJW, McKean JF. An investigation of the pharmacokinetic profile of propofol (Diprivan) after administration for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia by repeat bolus doses in patients having spinal anaesthetic block. Postgrad Med J. 1985 61 (Suppl 3):60-1.

195. Food and Drug Administration. Propofol (marketed as Diprivan and as generic products): FDA alert. Rockville, MD; June 2007. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/PostmarketDrugSafetyInformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm109357.htm

197. Bennett SN, McNeil MM, Bland LA et al. Postoperative infections traced to contamination of an intravenous anesthetic, propofol. N Engl J Med. 1995; 333:147-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7791816?dopt=AbstractPlus

198. Fukada T, Ozaki M. Microbial growth in propofol formulations with disodium edetate and the influence of venous access system dead space. Anaesthesia. 2007; 62:575-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17506735?dopt=AbstractPlus

199. Jansson JR, Fukada T, Ozaki M et al. Propofol EDTA and reduced incidence of infection. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006; 34:362-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16802492?dopt=AbstractPlus

200. Roussin A, Montastruc JL, Lapeyre-Mestre M. Pharmacological and clinical evidences on the potential for abuse and dependence of propofol: a review of the literature. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 21:459-66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17868199?dopt=AbstractPlus

201. Kranioti EF, Mavroforou A, Mylonakis P et al. Lethal self administration of propofol (Diprivan): a case report and review of the literature. Forensic Sci Int. 2007; 167:56-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16431058?dopt=AbstractPlus

202. Bonnet U, Harkener J, Scherbaum N. A case report of propofol dependence in a physician. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2008; 40:215-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18720673?dopt=AbstractPlus

203. Riezzo I, Centini F, Neri M et al. Brugada-like EKG pattern and myocardial effects in a chronic propofol abuser. Clin Toxicol. 2009; 47:358-63.

204. Wischmeyer PE, Johnson BR, Wilson JE et al. A survey of propofol abuse in academic anesthesia programs. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105:1066-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17898389?dopt=AbstractPlus

205. Dexter F. Detecting diversion of anesthetic drugs by providers. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105:897-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17898362?dopt=AbstractPlus

206. Fritz G, Niemczyk W. Propofol dependency in a lay person. Anaesthesiology. 2002; 96:505-6.

207. Schneider U, Rada D, Rollnik JD et al. Propofol dependency after treatment of tension headache. Addict Biol. 2001; 6:263-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11900605?dopt=AbstractPlus

208. Klausz G, Rona K, Kristof I et al. Evaluation of fatal propofol intoxication due to self administration. J Forensic Leg Med. 2009; 16:287-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19481714?dopt=AbstractPlus

209. Kirby RR, Colaw JM, Douglas MM. Death from propofol: accident, suicide, or murder? Anesth Analg. 2009; 108:1182-4.

210. Zeiler SR, Kaplan PW. Propofol withdrawal seizures (or not). Seizure. 2008; 17:665-7. Epub 2008 May 14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18482853?dopt=AbstractPlus

211. Alapat PM, Zimmerman JL. Toxicology in the critical care unit. Chest. 2008; 133:1006-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18398122?dopt=AbstractPlus

212. Symington L, Thakore S. A review of the use of propofol for procedural sedation in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2006; 23:89-93. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16439733?dopt=AbstractPlus

213. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE). Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Downers Grove, IL; 2018. From ASGE website. https://www.asge.org/docs/default-source/education/practice_guidelines/piis0016510717321119.pdf?sfvrsn=50a3aa50_4

214. American College of Emergency Physicians. Policy statement: Procedural sedation in the emergency department. Approved June 2017. From the ACEP website. https://www.acep.org/globalassets/new-pdfs/policy-statements/procedural.sedation.in.the.ed.pdf

215. Sahinovic MM, Struys MMRF, Absalom AR. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Propofol. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018; 57:1539-1558. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30019172?dopt=AbstractPlus

216. Miller D, Lewis SR, Pritchard MW et al. Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 8:CD012317. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30129968?dopt=AbstractPlus

217. Schraag S, Pradelli L, Alsaleh AJO et al. Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018; 18:162. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409186?dopt=AbstractPlus

218. Prabhakar H, Singh GP, Mahajan C et al. Intravenous versus inhalational techniques for rapid emergence from anaesthesia in patients undergoing brain tumour surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 9:CD010467. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27611234?dopt=AbstractPlus

219. Garewal D, Powell S, Milan SJ et al. Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; :CD007274. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22696368?dopt=AbstractPlus

220. Byrne MF, Chiba N, Singh H et al. Propofol use for sedation during endoscopy in adults: a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position statement. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008; 22:457-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18478130?dopt=AbstractPlus

221. Chidambaran V, Costandi A, D'Mello A. Propofol: a review of its role in pediatric anesthesia and sedation. CNS Drugs. 2015; 29:543-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290263?dopt=AbstractPlus

222. Wakai A, Blackburn C, McCabe A et al. The use of propofol for procedural sedation in emergency departments. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; :CD007399. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26222247?dopt=AbstractPlus

223. Grunwell JR, Travers C, McCracken CE et al. Procedural Sedation Outside of the Operating Room Using Ketamine in 22,645 Children: A Report From the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016; 17:1109-1116. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27505716?dopt=AbstractPlus

224. Lewis SR, Nicholson A, Reed SS et al. Anaesthetic and sedative agents used for electrical cardioversion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; :CD010824. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25803543?dopt=AbstractPlus

225. Kumar G, Stendall C, Mistry R et al. A comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol with sevoflurane or desflurane in ambulatory surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2014; 69:1138-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24847783?dopt=AbstractPlus

226. Godambe SA, Elliot V, Matheny D et al. Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department. Pediatrics. 2003; 112:116-23. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12837876?dopt=AbstractPlus

227. Miner JR, Biros M, Krieg S et al. Randomized clinical trial of propofol versus methohexital for procedural sedation during fracture and dislocation reduction in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10:931-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12957974?dopt=AbstractPlus

228. Swanson ER, Seaberg DC, Mathias S. The use of propofol for sedation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 1996; 3:234-8 . http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8673779?dopt=AbstractPlus

229. Euasobhon P, Dej-Arkom S, Siriussawakul A, et al. Lidocaine for reducing propofol-induced pain on induction of anaesthesia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD007874. Published 2016 Feb 18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26888026?dopt=AbstractPlus

230. Jalota L, Kalira V, George E, et al. Prevention of pain on injection of propofol: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2011;342:d1110. Published 2011 Mar 15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21406529?dopt=AbstractPlus

231. Zorrilla-Vaca A, Arevalo JJ, Escandón-Vargas K, Soltanifar D, Mirski MA. Infectious Disease Risk Associated with Contaminated Propofol Anesthesia, 1989-2014(1). Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22(6):981-992. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27192163?dopt=AbstractPlus

232. Chamorro C, de Latorre FJ, Montero A, et al. Comparative study of propofol versus midazolam in the sedation of critically ill patients: results of a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(6):932-939. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8681594?dopt=AbstractPlus

233. Prabhakar H, Kalaivani M. Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;2(2):CD009202. Published 2017 Feb 3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28155226?dopt=AbstractPlus

234. Glauser T, Shinnar S, Gloss D, et al. Evidence-Based Guideline: Treatment of Convulsive Status Epilepticus in Children and Adults: Report of the Guideline Committee of the American Epilepsy Society. Epilepsy Curr. 2016;16(1):48-61. doi:10.5698/1535-7597-16.1.48 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900382?dopt=AbstractPlus

249. ASHP. Standardize 4 Safety: pediatric continuous infusion standards. Updated 2024 Mar. From ASHP website. Updates may be available at ASHP website. https://www.ashp.org/standardize4safety

250. ASHP. Standardize 4 Safety: adult continuous infusion standards. Updated 2024 Mar. From ASHP website. Updates may be available at ASHP website. https://www.ashp.org/standardize4safety

750. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug safety communication: FDA review results in new warnings about using general anesthetics and sedation drugs in young children and pregnant women. Silver Spring, MD; 2016 Dec 14. From FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm532356.htm

751. Davidson AJ, Disma N, de Graaff JC et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age after general anaesthesia and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016; 387:239-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507180?dopt=AbstractPlus

752. Sun LS, Li G, Miller TL et al. Association Between a Single General Anesthesia Exposure Before Age 36 Months and Neurocognitive Outcomes in Later Childhood. JAMA. 2016; 315:2312-20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27272582?dopt=AbstractPlus

753. US Food and Drug Administration. Drug safety communication: FDA approves labeling changes for use of general anesthetic and sedation drugs in young children. Silver Spring, MD; 2017 Apr 27. From FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm554634.htm

754. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Position on monitored anesthesia care. Oct 17, 2018. From the ASA website. https://www.asahq.org/

755. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Distinguishing monitored anesthesia care (“MAC”) from moderate sedation/analgesia (conscious sedation). Oct 17, 2018. From the ASA website. https://www.asahq.org/

756. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance document: temporary policy on repackaging or combining propofol drug products during the COVID-19 public health emergency guidance for industry. Silver Spring, MD; 2020 Apr. From FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/media/137224/download

757. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Statement on safe use of propofol. Amended Oct 23, 2019. From the ASA website. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/statement-on-safe-use-of-propofol

758. US Food and Drug Administration. Fact sheet for healthcare providers: emergency use authorization (EUA) of fresenius propoven 2% emulsion. Silver Spring, MD; From FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/media/137889/download

759. US Food and Drug Administration. Fact sheet for health care providers: emergency use authorization (EUA) of Propofol-Lipuro 1% injectable emulsion for infusion. Silver Spring, MD; From FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/media/146681/download

760. US Food and Drug Administration. Letter of authorization: Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for emergency use of Propofol-Lipuro 1% injectable emulsion for infusion to maintain sedation via continuous infusion in patients greater than 16 years old who require mechanical ventilation in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) setting during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. 2021 March 12. From FDA website. https://www.fda.gov/media/146680/download

800. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46:e825-e873. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30113379?dopt=AbstractPlus

801. Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41:263-306. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23269131?dopt=AbstractPlus

817. Gerlach AT, Murphy CV, Dasta JF. An updated focused review of dexmedetomidine in adults. Ann Pharmacother. 2009; 43:2064-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19934395?dopt=AbstractPlus

818. Riker RR, Shehabi Y, Bokesch PM et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for sedation of critically ill patients: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2009; 301:489-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19188334?dopt=AbstractPlus

819. Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Herr DL et al. Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007; 298:2644-53. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18073360?dopt=AbstractPlus

820. Jakob SM, Ruokonen E, Grounds RM et al. Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam or propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation: two randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 2012; 307:1151-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22436955?dopt=AbstractPlus

821. Godwin SA, Caro DA, Wolf SJ et al. Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2005; 45:177-96. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15671976?dopt=AbstractPlus

822. Godwin SA, Burton JH, Gerardo CJ et al. Clinical policy: procedural sedation and analgesia in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 63:247-58.e18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24438649?dopt=AbstractPlus

823. . Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology. Anesthesiology. 2018; 128:437-479. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334501?dopt=AbstractPlus

824. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Continuum of depth of sedation: definition of general anesthesia and levels of sedation/analgesia. Last amended Oct 23, 2019. From the ASA website. https://www.asahq.org/

1169. Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). ISMP list of high-alert medications in acute care settings. ISMP; 2018. https://www.ismp.org/sites/default/files/attachments/2018-08/highAlert2018-Acute-Final.pdf