Skip to main content

Cefpodoxime (Monograph)

Brand name: Vantin
Drug class: Third Generation Cephalosporins
CAS number: 87239-81-4

Medically reviewed by Drugs.com on Sep 29, 2023. Written by ASHP.

Introduction

Antibacterial; β-lactam antibiotic; aminothiazolyl third generation cephalosporin.1 2 3 14 66

Uses for Cefpodoxime

Acute Otitis Media (AOM)

Treatment of AOM caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae (penicillin-susceptible strains only), Haemophilus influenzae (including β-lactamase-producing strains), or Moraxella catarrhalis (including β-lactamase-producing strains).1 28 29 30 31 37 66

When anti-infectives indicated, AAP recommends high-dose amoxicillin or amoxicillin and clavulanate as drugs of choice for initial treatment of AOM; certain cephalosporins (cefdinir, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, ceftriaxone) recommended as alternatives for initial treatment in penicillin-allergic patients without a history of severe and/or recent penicillin-allergic reactions.37

Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis

Treatment of pharyngitis and tonsillitis caused by susceptible S. pyogenes (group A β-hemolytic streptococci).1 10 11 14 23 26 27 38 40 66 Generally effective in eradicating S. pyogenes from nasopharynx; efficacy in prevention of subsequent rheumatic fever not established to date.1 66

AAP, IDSA, AHA, and others recommend a penicillin regimen (10 days of oral penicillin V or oral amoxicillin or single dose of IM penicillin G benzathine) as treatment of choice for S. pyogenes pharyngitis and tonsillitis;10 11 16 17 other anti-infectives (oral cephalosporins, oral macrolides, oral clindamycin) recommended as alternatives in penicillin-allergic patients.10 11 16 17

If an oral cephalosporin used, 10-day regimen of first generation cephalosporin (cefadroxil, cephalexin) preferred instead of other cephalosporins with broader spectrums of activity (e.g., cefaclor, cefdinir, cefixime, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime).10 16 17

Respiratory Tract Infections

Treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis caused by susceptible S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae (including β-lactamase-producing strains), or M. catarrhalis.1 14 23 39 40 66 Because of variable activity against S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, IDSA no longer recommends second or third generation oral cephalosporins for empiric monotherapy of acute bacterial sinusitis.43 Oral amoxicillin or amoxicillin and clavulanate usually recommended for empiric treatment.43 44 If an oral cephalosporin used as an alternative in children (e.g., in penicillin-allergic individuals), combination regimen that includes a third generation cephalosporin (cefixime or cefpodoxime) and clindamycin (or linezolid) recommended.43 44

Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis caused by susceptible S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae (non-β-lactamase-producing strains only), or M. catarrhalis.1 14 21 61 66

Treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by susceptible S. pneumoniae or H. influenzae (including β-lactamase-producing strains).1 14 22 66 Recommended by ATS and IDSA as an alternative for treatment of CAP caused by penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae.58 Also recommended as an alternative in certain combination regimens used for empiric treatment of CAP.58 Select regimen for empiric treatment of CAP based on most likely pathogens and local susceptibility patterns; after pathogen is identified, modify to provide more specific therapy (pathogen-directed therapy).58

For empiric outpatient treatment of CAP when risk factors for drug-resistant S. pneumoniae are present (e.g., comorbidities such as chronic heart, lung, liver, or renal disease, diabetes, alcoholism, malignancies, asplenia, immunosuppression, use of anti-infectives within the last 3 months), ATS and IDSA recommend monotherapy with a fluoroquinolone active against S. pneumoniae (moxifloxacin, gemifloxacin, levofloxacin) or, alternatively, a combination regimen that includes a β-lactam active against S. pneumoniae (high-dose amoxicillin or fixed combination of amoxicillin and clavulanic acid or, alternatively, ceftriaxone, cefpodoxime, or cefuroxime) given in conjunction with a macrolide (azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin) or doxycycline.58 Cefpodoxime and cefuroxime may be less active against S. pneumoniae than amoxicillin or ceftriaxone.58

If an oral cephalosporin is used as an alternative to penicillin G or amoxicillin for treatment of CAP caused by penicillin-susceptible S. pneumoniae, ATS and IDSA recommend cefdinir, cefditoren, cefpodoxime, cefprozil, or cefuroxime.51

Skin and Skin Structure Infections

Treatment of mild to moderate uncomplicated skin and skin structure infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (including penicillinase- and non-penicillinase-producing strains) or S. pyogenes.1 14 24 66

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)

Treatment of uncomplicated UTIs (cystitis) caused by susceptible Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, or S. saprophyticus.1 14 25 66

Some clinicians suggest that certain oral third generation cephalosporins (cefdinir, cefpodoxime, ceftibuten) are one of several alternatives for outpatient treatment of recurrent UTIs or UTIs that occur in patients who have indwelling urinary catheters or acquired the infections in hospitals or nursing homes; these infections likely to be caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli.11

Gonorrhea and Associated Infections

Has been used for treatment of acute, uncomplicated, urethral or cervical gonorrhea caused by susceptible Neisseria gonorrhoeae (including penicillinase-producing strains [PPNG]).1 10 13 15 63 66 Has been used for treatment of uncomplicated anorectal gonorrhea in women.1 66

Efficacy for treatment of anorectal infections in men or pharyngeal gonococcal infections in men or women not established.1 66

Because of concerns related to recent reports of N. gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins, CDC states that oral cephalosporins no longer recommended as first-line treatment for uncomplicated gonorrhea.68 For treatment of uncomplicated urogenital, anorectal, or pharyngeal gonorrhea, CDC recommends a combination regimen that includes a single dose of IM ceftriaxone and either a single dose of oral azithromycin or 7-day regimen of oral doxycycline.68

Cefpodoxime Dosage and Administration

Administration

Oral Administration

Administer orally.1 66

Administer tablets with food.1 (See Food under Pharmacokinetics.)

Administer oral suspension without regard to meals.66

Reconstitution

Reconstitute oral suspension at time of dispensing by adding amount of water specified on the container in 2 portions; invert bottle and shake after each addition.66

Reconstituted suspension contains 50 or 100 mg of cefpodoxime/5 mL.66

Shake suspension well prior to administration of each dose.66

Dosage

Available as cefpodoxime proxetil; dosage expressed in terms of cefpodoxime.1 66

Pediatric Patients

General Pediatric Dosage
Oral

Children beyond neonatal period: AAP recommends 10 mg/kg daily in 2 equally divided doses for treatment of mild or moderate infections.10 AAP states the drug is inappropriate for treatment of severe infections.10

Acute Otitis Media (AOM)
Oral

Children 2 months through 12 years of age: 5 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5 days.66

AAP does not recommend oral anti-infective regimens of <10 days’ duration in children <2 years of age or in patients with severe symptoms.37

Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis
Oral

Children 2 months through 12 years of age: 5 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5–10 days.66

Children ≥12 years of age: 100 mg every 12 hours for 5–10 days.1 66

IDSA and AHA do not recommend cephalosporin regimens of ≤5 days’ duration.16 17

Respiratory Tract Infections
Acute Sinusitis
Oral

Children 2 months through 12 years of age: 5 mg/kg every 12 hours for 10 days.66

Children ≥12 years of age: 200 mg every 12 hours for 10 days.1 66

Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis
Oral

Children ≥12 years of age: 200 mg every 12 hours for 10 days.1 66

Community-acquired Pneumonia
Oral

Children ≥12 years of age: 200 mg every 12 hours for 14 days.1 66

Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Oral

Children ≥12 years of age: 400 mg every 12 hours for 7–14 days.1 66

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)
Oral

Children ≥12 years of age: 100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days.1 66

Gonorrhea and Associated Infections
Uncomplicated Gonorrhea in Adolescents
Oral

Uncomplicated urethral or cervical gonorrhea in adolescents ≥12 years of age: Manufacturer recommends 200 mg as a single dose.1 66

Uncomplicated anorectal gonorrhea in adolescent girls ≥12 years of age: Manufacturer recommends 200 mg as a single dose.1 66

Not recommended by CDC as first-line treatment.68 (See Gonorrhea and Associated Infections under Uses.)

Adults

Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis
Oral

100 mg every 12 hours for 5–10 days.1 66

IDSA and AHA do not recommend cephalosporin regimens of ≤5 days’ duration.16 17

Respiratory Tract Infections
Acute Maxillary Sinusitis
Oral

200 mg every 12 hours for 10 days.1 66

Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis
Oral

200 mg every 12 hours for 10 days.1

Community-acquired Pneumonia
Oral

200 mg every 12 hours for 14 days.1 66

Skin and Skin Structure Infections
Oral

400 mg every 12 hours for 7–14 days.1 66

Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs)
Oral

100 mg every 12 hours for 7 days.1 66

Gonorrhea and Associated Infections
Uncomplicated Gonorrhea
Oral

Uncomplicated urethral or cervical gonorrhea: Manufacturer recommends 200 mg as a single dose.1 66

Uncomplicated anorectal gonorrhea in women: Manufacturer recommends 200 mg as a single dose.1 66

Not recommended by CDC as first-line treatment.68 (See Gonorrhea and Associated Infections under Uses.)

Prescribing Limits

Pediatric Patients

Acute Otitis Media (AOM)
Oral

Maximum 200 mg every 12 hours for children 2 months to 12 years of age.66

Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis
Oral

Maximum 100 mg every 12 hours for children 2 months to 12 years of age.66

Acute Maxillary Sinusitis
Oral

Maximum 200 mg every 12 hours for children 2 months to 12 years of age.66

Special Populations

Hepatic Impairment

Dosage adjustments not required in patients with cirrhosis (with or without ascites).1 66

Renal Impairment

Patients with Clcr <30 mL/minute: Give usual dose once every 24 hours.1 66

Patients maintained on hemodialysis: Give usual dose 3 times weekly after dialysis.1 66

Geriatric Patients

No dosage adjustments except those related to renal impairment.1 (See Renal Impairment under Dosage and Administration.)

Cautions for Cefpodoxime

Contraindications

Warnings/Precautions

Warnings

Superinfection/Clostridium difficile-associated Diarrhea and Colitis

Possible emergence and overgrowth of nonsusceptible organisms, including Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, enterococci, or Candida, with prolonged use.1 66 Careful observation of the patient is essential.1 Institute appropriate therapy if superinfection occurs.1 66

Treatment with anti-infectives alters normal colon flora and may permit overgrowth of Clostridium difficile.1 42 66 C. difficile infection (CDI) and C. difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis (CDAD; also known as antibiotic-associated diarrhea and colitis or pseudomembranous colitis) reported with nearly all anti-infectives, including cefpodoxime, and may range in severity from mild diarrhea to fatal colitis.1 42 66 C. difficile produces toxins A and B which contribute to development of CDAD;1 40 42 hypertoxin-producing strains of C. difficile are associated with increased morbidity and mortality since they may be refractory to anti-infectives and colectomy may be required.1 40

Consider CDAD if diarrhea develops during or after therapy and manage accordingly.1 42 66 Obtain careful medical history since CDAD may occur as late as 2 months or longer after anti-infective therapy is discontinued.1 42 66

If CDAD is suspected or confirmed, discontinue anti-infectives not directed against C. difficile whenever possible.1 42 66 Initiate appropriate supportive therapy (e.g., fluid and electrolyte management, protein supplementation), anti-infective therapy directed against C. difficile (e.g., metronidazole, vancomycin), and surgical evaluation as clinically indicated.1 42 66

Sensitivity Reactions

Hypersensitivity Reactions

Possible hypersensitivity reactions such as urticaria, pruritus, rash (maculopapular, erythematous, morbilliform), fever and chills, eosinophilia, joint pain or inflammation, edema, erythema, genital and anal pruritus, angioedema, shock, hypotension, vasodilatation, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, toxic epidermal necrolysis, exfoliative dermatitis, and anaphylaxis reported with cephalosporins.a

If a hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue cefpodoxime and institute appropriate therapy as indicated (e.g., epinephrine, corticosteroids, and maintenance of an adequate airway and oxygen).1 66

Cross-hypersensitivity

Partial cross-sensitivity among cephalosporins and other β-lactam antibiotics, including penicillins and cephamycins.1 50 66

Prior to initiation of therapy, make careful inquiry concerning previous hypersensitivity reactions to cephalosporins, penicillins, or other drugs.1 66 Cautious use recommended in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to penicillins:1 66 avoid use in those who have had an immediate-type (anaphylactic) hypersensitivity reaction1 50 51 and administer with caution in those who have had a delayed-type (e.g., rash, fever, eosinophilia) reaction.a

General Precautions

Selection and Use of Anti-infectives

To reduce development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain effectiveness of cefpodoxime and other antibacterials, use only for treatment or prevention of infections proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria.1 66

When selecting or modifying anti-infective therapy, use results of culture and in vitro susceptibility testing.1 66 In the absence of such data, consider local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns when selecting anti-infectives for empiric therapy.1 66

Phenylketonuria

Depending on the manufacturer, oral suspension may contain aspartame (NutraSweet), which is metabolized in the GI tract to provide 17 mg of phenylalanine per 5 mL.66 101 102 103 104 105

Specific Populations

Pregnancy

Category B.1 66

Lactation

Distributed into milk.1 66 Discontinue nursing or cefpodoxime.1 66

Pediatric Use

Safety and efficacy not established in neonates or infants <2 months of age.1 66

Adverse effects in pediatric patients similar to those in adults.1 14 22 26 29 30 31 66

Geriatric Use

Safety and efficacy in those ≥65 years of age similar to that in younger adults.1 66

Plasma half-life may be slightly increased, however other pharmacokinetic parameters are unaffected.1 32 33 66

Consider age-related decreases in renal function when selecting dosage and adjust dosage if necessary.1 32 33 66 (See Renal Impairment under Dosage and Administration.)

Hepatic Impairment

Pharmacokinetics not altered6 ; dosage adjustments not required.1 66

Renal Impairment

Decreased clearance in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (Clcr <50 mL/minute);1 reduce dosage if Clcr <30 mL/minute.1 66 (See Renal Impairment under Dosage and Administration.)

Common Adverse Effects

Diarrhea, loose stools, nausea, vomiting.1 2 14 40 66

Drug Interactions

Specific Drugs and Laboratory Tests

Drug or Test

Interaction

Comments

Antacids (sodium bicarbonate or aluminum-containing)

Decreased absorption of cefpodoxime1 66

Diuretics

Caution if used concomitantly with potent diuretics1 66

Histamine H2-receptor antagonists

Decreased absorption of cefpodoxime1 66

Nephrotoxic drugs

Potential for increased risk of nephrotoxicitya

Closely monitor renal function when used concomitantly with nephrotoxic drugs1 66

Probenecid

Decreased clearance and increased cefpodoxime plasma concentrations1 66

Tests for glucose

Possible false-positive reactions in urine glucose tests using Clinitest, Benedict’s solution, or Fehling’s solutiona

Use glucose tests based on enzymatic glucose oxidase reactions (e.g., Clinistix, Tes-Tape)a

Cefpodoxime Pharmacokinetics

Absorption

Bioavailability

Cefpodoxime proxetil is a prodrug that is absorbed from the GI tract and de-esterified to the active metabolite, cefpodoxime.1 66

About 50% of a dose is absorbed from the GI tract;1 6 14 66 peak plasma concentrations of cefpodoxime attained within 2–3 hours.1 66

Food

Food increases bioavailability of cefpodoxime proxetil tablets but does not affect bioavailability of the oral suspension.1 6 57 66

Distribution

Extent

Distributed into blister fluid,1 6 66 interstitial fluid,14 middle ear fluid,19 tonsils,1 6 14 36 66 maxillary sinus mucosa,6 bronchial mucosa,14 pleural fluid,6 14 35 lung tissue,1 6 20 34 66 epithelial lining fluid,20 myometrium,6 14 seminal fluid,6 14 prostatic adenoma tissue,6 14 and bile.6

Cefpodoxime is distributed into milk.1 14 66

Plasma Protein Binding

21–29%.1 66

Elimination

Metabolism

Cefpodoxime proxetil is a prodrug and is inactive until hydrolyzed in vivo to cefpodoxime by nonspecific esterases within the intestinal lumen.1 2 6 14 66

Cefpodoxime is not appreciably metabolized.1 66

Elimination Route

Approximately 53% of a dose eliminated in urine and 43% eliminated in feces as cefpodoxime.6

Half-life

2.1–3.3 hours in adults with normal renal function.1 6 14 66

Special Populations

Cirrhosis does not affect the half-life or renal clearance of the drug.1 66 Ascites does not appear to affect values in cirrhotic patients.1 66

Clearance decreased in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment (Clcr <50 mL/minute).1 66 Plasma half-life averages 3.5 hours in those with mild renal impairment and 5.9 or 9.8 hours in those with moderate or severe renal impairment, respectively.1 66

In geriatric patients, plasma half-life averages 4.2 hours;1 66 other pharmacokinetic values are similar to those in younger adults.1 66

Stability

Storage

Oral

Tablets

20–25°C in tight container.1

For Suspension

20–25°C.66 After reconstitution, refrigerate suspension in tight container at 2–8°C;66 discard after 14 days.66

Actions and Spectrum

Advice to Patients

Preparations

Excipients in commercially available drug preparations may have clinically important effects in some individuals; consult specific product labeling for details.

Please refer to the ASHP Drug Shortages Resource Center for information on shortages of one or more of these preparations.

* available from one or more manufacturer, distributor, and/or repackager by generic (nonproprietary) name

Cefpodoxime Proxetil

Routes

Dosage Forms

Strengths

Brand Names

Manufacturer

Oral

For suspension

50 mg (of cefpodoxime) per 5 mL*

Cefpodoxime Proxetil for Suspension

100 mg (of cefpodoxime) per 5 mL*

Cefpodoxime Proxetil for Suspension

Tablets, film-coated

100 mg (of cefpodoxime)*

Cefpodoxime Proxetil Film-coated Tablets

200 mg (of cefpodoxime)*

Cefpodoxime Proxetil Film-coated Tablets

AHFS DI Essentials™. © Copyright 2024, Selected Revisions October 9, 2013. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Inc., 4500 East-West Highway, Suite 900, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.

References

1. Sandoz Inc. Cefpodoxime proxetil tablet, film-coated prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2008 Feb.

2. Kumazawa J. Summary of clinical experience with cefpodoxime proxetil in adults in Japan. Drugs. 1991; 42(Suppl C):1-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1726202?dopt=AbstractPlus

3. Abraham EP. Cephalosporins 1945-1986. Drugs. 1987; 34(Suppl 2):1-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3319494?dopt=AbstractPlus

4. Bergan T. Pharmacokinetic properties of the cephalosporins. Drugs. 1987; 34(Suppl 2):89-104. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3319507?dopt=AbstractPlus

5. Komai T, Kawai K, Tsubaki H et al. Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of CS-807, a new cephem antibiotic, in experimental animals. Chemotherapy (Tokyo). 1988; 36(Suppl 1):229-40.

6. Borin MT. A review of the pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime proxetil. Drugs. 1991; 42(Suppl 3):13-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1726203?dopt=AbstractPlus

7. Wiedemann B, Luhmer E, Zühlsdorf MT. Microbiological evaluation of cefpodoxime proxetil. Drugs. 1991; 42(Suppl 3):6-12.

8. Dabernat H, Avril JL, Boussougant Y. In-vitro activity of cefpodoxime against pathogens responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):1-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2127267?dopt=AbstractPlus

9. Holt HA, Bywater MJ, Reeves DS. In-vitro activity of cefpodoxime against 1834 isolates from domiciliary infections at 20 UK centres. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):7-12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292533?dopt=AbstractPlus

10. American Academy of Pediatrics. Red Book: 2012 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases. 29th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012.

11. Anon. Drugs for bacterial infections. Med Lett Treat Guid. 2010; 8:43-52.

13. Workowski KA, Berman S, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010; 59(RR-12):1-110.

14. Frampton JE, Brogden RN, Langtry HD et al. Cefpodoxime proxetil: a review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential. Drugs. 1992; 44:889-917. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1280571?dopt=AbstractPlus

15. Anon. Drugs for sexually transmitted infections. Med Lett Treat Guid. 2004; 2:67-74.

16. Shulman ST, Bisno AL, Clegg HW et al. Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis: 2012 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 55:1279-82. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23091044?dopt=AbstractPlus

17. Gerber MA, Baltimore RS, Eaton CB et al. Prevention of rheumatic fever and diagnosis and treatment of acute Streptococcal pharyngitis: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, the Interdisciplinary Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, and the Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research: endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation. 2009; 119:1541-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19246689?dopt=AbstractPlus

19. van Dyk JC, Terspolsky SA, Meyer CS et al. Penetration of cefpodoxime into middle ear fluid in pediatric patients with acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997; 16:79-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9002110?dopt=AbstractPlus

20. Muller-Serieys C, Bancal C, Dombret MC et al. Penetration of cefpodoxime proxetil in lung parenchyma and epithelial lining fluid of noninfected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992; 36:2099-2013. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=245462&blobtype=pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1444291?dopt=AbstractPlus

21. Phillips H, Van Hook CJ, Butler T et al. A comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil and cefaclor in the treatment of acute exacerbation of COPD in adults. Chest. 1993; 104:1387-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8222793?dopt=AbstractPlus

22. Klein M, for the International Study Group. Multicenter trial of cefpodoxime proxetil vs. amoxicillin-clavulanate in acute lower respiratory tract infections in childhood. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995; 14:S19-22.

23. Bergogne-Berezin E. Cefpodoxime proxetil in upper respiratory tract infections. Drugs. 1991; 42(Suppl 3):25-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1726205?dopt=AbstractPlus

24. Tack KJ, Wilks NE, Semerdjian G et al. Cefpodoxime proxetil in the treatment of skin and soft tissue infections. Drugs. 1991; 42(Suppl 3):51-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1726208?dopt=AbstractPlus

25. Cox CE, Graveline JF, Luongo JM. Review of clinical experience in the United States with cefpodoxime proxetil in adults with uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Drugs. 1991; 42(Suppl 3):41-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1726207?dopt=AbstractPlus

26. Dajani AS, Kessler SL, Mendelson R et al. Cefpodoxime proxetil vs. penicillin V in pediatric streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1993; 12:275-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8483620?dopt=AbstractPlus

27. Dajani AS. Pharyngitis/tonsillitis: European and United States experience with cefpodoxime proxetil. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995; 14:S7-11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7792129?dopt=AbstractPlus

28. Cohen R. Clinical experience with cefpodoxime proxetil in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995; 14:S12-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7792125?dopt=AbstractPlus

29. Mendelman PM, Del Beccaro MA, McLinn SE et al. Cefpodoxime proxetil compared with amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of otitis media. J Pediatr. 1992; 121:459-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1517926?dopt=AbstractPlus

30. Fernandez GJ, MacLoughlin GJF, Barreto DG et al. Cefpodoxime proxetil suspension compared with cefaclor suspension for treatment of acute otitis media in paediatric patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996; 37:565-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9182113?dopt=AbstractPlus

31. Asmar BI, Dajani AS, Del Beccaro MA et al. Comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil and cefixime in the treatment of acute otitis media in infants and children. Pediatrics. 1994; 94:847-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7971000?dopt=AbstractPlus

32. Tremblay D, Dupront A, Ho C et al. Pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in young and elderly volunteers after single doses. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):21-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292526?dopt=AbstractPlus

33. Backhouse C, Wade A, Williamson P et al. Multiple dose pharmacokinetics of cefpodoxime in young adult and elderly patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):29-34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292527?dopt=AbstractPlus

34. Couraud L, Andrews JM, Lecoeur H et al. Concentrations of cefpodoxime in plasma and lung tissue after a single oral dose of cefpodoxime proxetil. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):35-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292528?dopt=AbstractPlus

35. Dumont R, Guetat F, Andrews JM et al. Concentrations of cefpodoxime in plasma and pleural fluid after a single oral dose of cefpodoxime proxetil. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):41-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292529?dopt=AbstractPlus

36. Gehanno P, Andrews JM, Ichou F et al. Concentrations of cefpodoxime in plasma and tonsillar tissue after a single oral dose of cefpodoxime proxetil. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):47-51. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292530?dopt=AbstractPlus

37. Lieberthal AS, Carroll AE, Chonmaitree T et al. The diagnosis and management of acute otitis media. Pediatrics. 2013; 131:e964-99. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23439909?dopt=AbstractPlus

38. Portier H, Chavanet P, Gouyon JB et al. Five day treatment of pharyngotonsillitis with cefpodoxime proxetil. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):79-85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2127268?dopt=AbstractPlus

39. Gehanno P, Depondt J, Barry B et al. Comparison of cefpodoxime proxetil with cefaclor in the treatment of sinusitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):87-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2127269?dopt=AbstractPlus

40. Safran C. Cefpodoxime proxetil: dosage, efficacy and tolerance in adults suffering from respiratory tract infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):93-101. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292535?dopt=AbstractPlus

41. Pichichero ME, Cohen R. Shortened course of antibiotic therapy for acute otitis media, sinusitis and tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1997; 16:680-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9239773?dopt=AbstractPlus

42. Cohen SH, Gerding DN, Johnson S et al. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA). Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010; 31:431-55. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20307191?dopt=AbstractPlus

43. Chow AW, Benninger MS, Brook I et al. IDSA clinical practice guideline for acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in children and adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2012; 54:e72-e112. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22438350?dopt=AbstractPlus

44. Wald ER, Applegate KE, Bordley C et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Bacterial Sinusitis in Children Aged 1 to 18 Years. Pediatrics. 2013; :. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23796742?dopt=AbstractPlus

45. Tack KJ, Henry DC, Gooch WM et al et al. Five-day cefdinir treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42:1073-5. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=105747&blobtype=pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9593129?dopt=AbstractPlus

46. Pichichero ME. Cephalosporins are superior to penicillin for treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: is the difference worth it? Pediatr Infect Dis. 1993; 12:268-74.

47. Aujard Y, Boucot I, Brahimi N et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of four-day cefuroxime axetil and ten-day penicillin treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995; 14:295-300. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7603811?dopt=AbstractPlus

48. Mehra S, Van Moerkerke M, Welck J et al. Short course therapy with cefuroxime axetil for group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998; 17:452-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9655533?dopt=AbstractPlus

49. Milatovic D. Evaluation of cefadroxil, penicillin and erythromycin in the treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991; 10:S61-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1945599?dopt=AbstractPlus

50. Kishiyam JL, Adelman DC. The cross-reactivity and immunology of β-lactam antibiotics. Drug Saf. 1994; 10:318-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8018304?dopt=AbstractPlus

51. Thompson JW, Jacobs RF. Adverse effects of newer cephalosporins: an update. Drug Saf. 1993; 9:132-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8397890?dopt=AbstractPlus

52. Kozyrskyj AL, Hildes-Ripstein GE, Longstaffe SEA et al. Treatment of acute otitis media with a shortened course of antibiotics: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 1998; 279:1736-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9624028?dopt=AbstractPlus

53. Reviewers’ comments (personal observations).

54. Gwaltney JM. Acute community-acquired sinusitis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996; 23:1209-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8953061?dopt=AbstractPlus

55. Evans KL. Recognition and management of sinusitis. Drugs. 1998; 56:59-71. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9664199?dopt=AbstractPlus

56. Gwaltney JM. Sinusitis. In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE, Dolin R, eds. Mandell, Douglas and Bennett’s principles and practices of infectious diseases. 4th ed. New York: Churchill Livingston; 1995: 585-90.

57. Kearns GL, Abdel-Rahman SM, Jacobs Rf et al. Cefpodoxime pharmacokinetics in children: effect of food. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998; 17:799-804. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9779765?dopt=AbstractPlus

58. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society consensus guidelines on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44 Suppl 2:S27-72. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17278083?dopt=AbstractPlus

59. Cooper RJ, Hoffman JR, Bartlett JG et al. Principles of appropriate antibiotic use for acute pharyngitis in adults: background. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 134:509-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11255530?dopt=AbstractPlus

60. Heffelfinger JD, Dowell SF, Jorgensen JH et al. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in the era of pneumococcal resistance. A report from the drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae therapeutic working group. Arch Intern Med. 2000; 160:1399-1408. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10826451?dopt=AbstractPlus

61. Periti P, Novelli A, Schildwachter G et al. Efficacy and tolerance of cefpodoxime proxetil compared with co-amoxiclav in the treatment of exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990; 26(Suppl E):63-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2292532?dopt=AbstractPlus

63. Novak E, Paxton LM, Tubbs HJ et al. Orally administered cefpodoxime proxetil for treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis in males: a dose-response study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992; 36:1764-5. http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&artid=192043&blobtype=pdf http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1416861?dopt=AbstractPlus

65. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: Twenty-first informational supplement. CLSI document M100-S21. Wayne, PA; 2011.

66. Sandoz Inc. Cefpodoxime proxetil granules, for suspension prescribing information. Princeton, NJ; 2008 Sep.

67. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Cephalosporin susceptibility among Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates--United States, 2000-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011; 60:873-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21734634?dopt=AbstractPlus

68. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Update to CDC's Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: oral cephalosporins no longer a recommended treatment for gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012; 61:590-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22874837?dopt=AbstractPlus

101. American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Aspartame: review of safety issues. JAMA. 1985; 254:400 2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2861297?dopt=AbstractPlus

102. Gossel TA. A review of aspartame: characteristics, safety and uses. US Pharm. 1984; 9:26,28 30.

103. Food and Drug Administration. Aspartame as an inactive ingredient in human drug products; labeling requirements. Proposed rule. [21 CFR Part 201] Fed Regist. 1983; 48:54993 5.

104. Food and Drug Administration. Food additives permitted for direct addition to food for human consumption; aspartame. Final rule. [21 CFR Part 172] Fed Regist. 1983; 48:31376 82.

105. Anon. Aspartame and other sweeteners. Med Lett Drugs Ther. 1982; 24:1 2.

a. AHFS Drug Information 2003. McEvoy GK, ed. Cephalosporins General Statement. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists; 2003:125-39.