Skip to main content

Lithostat User Reviews & Ratings

Lithostat has an average rating of 9.5 out of 10 from a total of 2 reviews on Drugs.com. 100% of reviewers reported a positive experience, while 0% reported a negative experience.

Condition Avg. Rating Reviews Compare
Bladder Infection
10.0
 1 reviews for Bladder Infection 81 medications
Urinary Tract Infection
9.0
 1 reviews for Urinary Tract Infection 199 medications

Write a review

  • lru...
  • February 14, 2011

For Urinary Tract Infection "Before using Lithostat, my catheter would become clogged with stones that stuck to wall of catheter. I get chronic urinary tract infections and struvite stones. Even when it was irrigated daily with Acetic Acid and Normal Saline, we had to change the catheter every week or more often. Since I have been on Lithostat, I have no more problems with my catheter."

9 / 10
Was this helpful?YesNo
9 Report
  • Bob...
  • Taken for 6 months to 1 year
  • December 27, 2023

For Bladder Infection "I completely concur with the prior review -- I had the identical experience, and don't know why 4 reputable urologists didn't suggest Lithostat for this problem before the last one finally mentioned it as a possibility. I'd go so far as to say it changed my life. The only problems have been: (1) expensive, and not covered by my insurance, (2) hard to get, frequently back-ordered, and (3) at commencement and on restarting (if you have to stop because of being back-ordered), fairly bad headaches for 2-3 days, not very responsive to Tylenol/Advil. But they pass."

10 / 10
Was this helpful?YesNo
0 Report
Reviews may be edited to correct grammar/spelling or to remove inappropriate language and content. Reviews that appear to be created by parties with a vested interest are not published. This information is not intended to endorse any particular medication. While these reviews may be helpful, they are not a substitute for the expertise, knowledge, and judgement of healthcare professionals.